February 17, 2010
The Week in Health Reform--Federal Legislative Overview
House and Senate
Things were quiet last week in Washington due to the 30 plus inches of snow the area received. On Feb. 9 House leaders announced that due to the heavy snow in the area they would suspend votes in the House for the remainder of the week. Congress will not be in session this week due to the President's Day recess and will reconvene the week of Feb. 22.
As a result of the congressional schedule, the timeframe for a floor vote on the McCarran-Ferguson antitrust legislation will be pushed back until the week of Feb. 22 at the earliest. Reports have stated that the antitrust bill is part of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) strategy of moving smaller pieces of health insurance legislation quickly to help build momentum for a comprehensive individual health insurance reform bill. The Speaker also continues to urge House Democrats to pass the Senate bill as long as it is accompanied by a separate "reconciliation" bill that would “fix” key provisions in the Senate bill (e.g., raising the threshold for the Cadillac tax and dropping the Nebraska Medicaid provisions) to satisfy some members of her caucus.
The Senate remained in session last week, despite the weather, although Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) stated that the Senate would not conduct any votes. On Feb. 11, Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking Member Charles Grassley (R-IA) released the highly anticipated “jobs bill” – The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act.
Senators Baucus and Grassley issued a joint statement, emphasizing that this bill was drafted with bipartisan input. They further stated: “We also agree that, once properly reviewed, the package should be considered in a deliberate, but expeditious manner. Any efforts to needlessly delay Senate completion of consideration of this package through partisan means will undermine our goal of timely action in the current economic climate. Action on the expired provisions is long overdue. Timely action on incentives for economic activity and job creation also is needed.”
Hours after details of the “HIRE” legislation were released, Majority Leader Reid publicly stated that he was scrapping the bill. Reid told reporters that when the Senate returns from its recess on Feb. 22, “we will move to a smaller package than has been talked about in the press.” Reid went on to state that some of the tax provisions included in the legislation – key to garnering Republican support for the deal – “confuse” the bill. Reid went on to say that, “we don’t have a jobs bill. We have a jobs agenda.”
The draft “HIRE” legislation addresses a number of key health care issues:
* The bill extends, by three months, the eligibility period for premium subsidies for state continuation coverage and COBRA continuation coverage to include persons who are unemployed on or before May 31, 2010. The bill also clarifies that these subsidies are available to persons who are involuntarily terminated from their jobs after previously losing their employer-sponsored coverage due to a reduction in hours. The premium subsidies originally were enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the “stimulus bill.”
* The bill provides for a seven-month Medicare physician payment fix (sometimes known as the “doc-fix”), maintaining physician payment rates at their current levels through Sept. 30, 2010. Under current law, in the absence of congressional action, physicians are scheduled to face a steep rate reduction on March 1.
* The bill provides for a one-year extension of both Medicare Advantage Special Needs Plans (section 626) and Medicare Cost Plans (section 627).
* The bill includes numerous provisions addressing Medicare fee-for-service reimbursement issues.
White House Health Care Reform Summit
In a pre-Super Bowl interview on CBS, President Obama said that he would like to host a televised health care summit with Republican and Democratic congressional leaders on Feb. 25. While specific details are not yet available, the summit represents the Obama Administration’s latest strategy to jumpstart the health care reform debate and seeks bipartisan cooperation following the loss of the Democrats’ supermajority in the Senate. Republican leaders expressed interest in the summit, and House Republican Leader John Boehner (OH) issued a statement saying that, "The best way to start on real, bipartisan reform would be to scrap those bills and focus on the kind of step-by-step improvements that will lower health care costs and expand access." In response, White House officials insisted that the President is not interested in starting from scratch on health reform.
This week Democratic and Republican congressional leaders also met with President Obama at the White House to discuss the jobs bill, health reform, energy, trade and other legislative priorities.
Following the meeting, the President spoke with reporters and he made the following comments about health reform: “I'm going to be starting from scratch in the sense that I will be open to any ideas that help promote these goals. What I will not do, what I don't think makes sense and I don't think the American people want to see, would be another year of partisan wrangling around these issues; another six months or eight months or nine months worth of hearings in every single committee in the House and the Senate in which there's a lot of posturing. Let's get the relevant parties together; let's put the best ideas on the table. My hope is that we can find enough overlap that we can say this is the right way to move forward, even if I don't get every single thing that I want.”
Chad Levin EasyToInsureME.com | Work: 866-492-3905 Fax: 215-364-3990 easytoinsureme@yahoo.com  |  |
Quoting and Saving on your health insurance has never been easier                             | ||
| Visit MyBlogLog and get a signature like this! | ||
Showing posts with label easytoinsureme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label easytoinsureme. Show all posts
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Health Insurance Reform from EasyToInsureME health insurance quotes
Federal
Owing to multiple blizzards in Washington, Congress started its President's Day recess a full week early and conducted no official business last week. However, there was some legislative drama as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid pulled the rug out from under Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus by scrapping the Baucus jobs bill (without warning), which contained many health insurance items, and replacing it with a stripped down, narrow jobs bill. Whether the health items Baucus originally inserted with Republican help will make it back to the table remains fuzzy. Among the health items that have been dropped are: the COBRA eligibility extension (to May 31); the “doc fix” (to October, 2010) of Medicare reimbursement rates; and the favorable statutory direction to CMS to calculate the 2011 Medicare Advantage rates "as if" the doc fix were in place.
States
California health insurance The Office of Patient Advocacy released a report card on the state’s HMOs last week. Aetna received 3 out of 4 stars. The goal of the report card is to allow consumers to compare how well health plans use personal medical records and help address conditions such as asthma, arthritis and diabetes.
COLORADO: Governor Bill Ritter held a press conference to announce what he calls "the next round of reforms that represent common sense." His legislative package includes bills to preclude insurance companies from charging different rates due to a person's gender, ensure that women have access to breast cancer screening, assure plain language is used in insurance forms, standardize insurance applications and explanations of benefits, and encourage greater use of online tools to enroll people in public programs. Apart from the Governor's proposals, a bill that would establish a public option was also introduced.
CONNECTICUT: In a short legislative session of only three months, the Insurance & Real Estate Committee wasted no time in putting forth an agenda that includes many concept drafts for repeat legislation from previous sessions. These include prohibiting health insurance copayments for preventive care, limiting prescription drug copayments, prohibiting Social Security disability payment offsets, and exempting the Municipal Employees Health Insurance Plans from the premium tax on small group premiums. In addition, the committee reintroduced legislation that includes nearly a dozen new health benefit mandates. The Council for Affordable Health Insurance, an independent think-tank, says that health insurance mandates could increase premiums in Connecticut by more than 50 percent overall.
GEORGIA: A bill was proposed last week that would impose significant restrictions on insurers' ability to rescind health insurance policies. Aetna, through the Georgia Association of Health Plans and AHIP, met with the legislator sponsoring the bill to express concerns with the bill.
INDIANA: The legislative session is at halftime, and the insurance agenda is now limited. Most insurance issue bills are officially dead, including a bill that would have prohibited health plan provisions requiring a contracted provider to accept more than a certain number of patients; coverage for dialysis treatment regardless of whether the facility is contracted or not and without certain benefit restrictions; and a bill that would have allowed out-of-network assignment of benefits. However, Aetna is expecting that a bill requiring insurer and HMO annual reporting of premium cost composition, including administrative costs, may be resurrected. A bill that restricts dental insurers and HMOs from establishing fee schedules for non-covered services passed the Senate, with our amendment to accommodate most of the key concerns expressed by opponents of the bill. As the bill stands, dental insurance plans may impose fee schedules for covered services, regardless of whether the plan actually pays for the services rendered.
KANSAS: An amended version of S.B. 389 related to dental services passed the Senate Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee on February 11. The amended bill prohibits any contract between a health insurer that offers a health benefit plan and a dentist from containing a provision that requires the dentist to accept a fee schedule for services unless the service is a covered service. Committee amendments added to the definition of a “health benefit plan” the following: any subscription agreement issued by a non-profit dental service corporation; any policy of health insurance purchased by an individual; the state children’s health insurance plan; and the state medical assistance program under Medicaid. We will continue to update you as this bill progresses and hope to make favorable changes as the bill moves through the House.
MASSACHUSETTS: Governor Deval Patrick filed a 40-page bill that proposes giving the insurance commissioner the power to hold public hearings on rate adjustments and essentially cap health care price increases. Rate increases for individuals would be held to the rate of medical inflation; those sold to employers with 50 or fewer workers could not exceed one and a half times the level of medical inflation. The legislation would also impose a two-year moratorium on any new health benefit mandates. Legislative leaders praised the intent of the governor’s plan but declined to promise support. Strong opposition is expected from medical provider groups. The Governor simultaneously announced emergency regulations to take immediate effect that will require health insurers to submit proposed small business rate increases for review by the state 30 days before they take effect. Several other proposed provisions include a requirement that insurers offer at least one coverage plan with a limited network of health care providers costing at least 10 percent less than health plans with access to more physicians. The Massachusetts Association of Health plans is lobbying in support of a bill introduced by Senate Insurance Chair Richard Moore that would create a cheaper health insurance product for small employers by capping payments to providers at just 10 percent above Medicare rates. The Massachusetts Medical Society is against that proposal.
MISSOURI: An autism coverage mandate bill was amended and “perfected” by the Senate and then sent to the Government Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Committee from which it must emerge before returning to the floor of the Senate. In addition to two mandate-related amendments, a third amendment to the bill allowing for limited cross border sales of health insurance also passed. In its current form, the bill contains a mandated offering of the coverage in the individual market. Coverage is limited to treatment ordered by a licensed physician or psychologist whose treatment plan the carrier is entitled to review every six months. Coverage for applied behavior analysis (ABA) is limited to $52,000 annually (down from the $72,000 as introduced) for persons under age 21. Meanwhile in the House, a bill containing significant language relating to the credentialing of autism service providers also passed. The bill also contains a mandate to offer coverage in the individual market and to groups of fewer than 25. Groups of 25 to 50 would be entitled to an exemption from the mandate if they could demonstrate an increase in premiums tied to the mandate. The bill limits annual coverage of ABA ($36,000 for children ages 3-9; $20,000 for children ages 9-21). Aetna will continue to monitor the status of these mandates, but it appears fairly clear at this point that something will pass on the issue of autism.
NEW JERSEY: Last week Governor Chris Christie declared a fiscal state of emergency calling a special session of the legislature to lay out his plan for dealing with state’s current $2.2 billion budget shortfall. His plan calls for significant cuts or eliminations across 375 state programs and withholding $500 million of state education aid. Of note on the program side is a $12.6 million reduction in Charity Care funding to hospitals, which pays for care to uninsured residents. In legislative action, the Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee held a three-hour public hearing on out-of-network reimbursement. Much of the hearing focused on the markedly higher billing practices of ambulatory surgery centers and one non-par hospital. Aetna presented testimony regarding its experience with the non-par hospital, citing their disparate year-over-year increase in charges compared to other similarly situated hospitals. Chairman Schaer indicated the committee will work over the next several months to craft a solution.
NEW YORK: With Democratic Senator Hiram Monserrate officially expelled from the Senate, the Democratic majority (31-30) now faces an uphill battle getting the 32 votes needed to pass legislation. However, both the Senate and the Assembly moved forward with a public hearing on the Executive Budget proposal for health, including the section mandating the prior approval of rate adjustments. The Health Plan Association testified on behalf of the industry. If enacted, Governor Paterson's proposal for an 85 percent medical loss ratio and a prior approval hearing process for all rate adjustments would essentially amount to government control of health insurance, undermining the private health insurance market in New York. Price controls would weaken health plan solvency, hurt providers and virtually eliminate innovation and efficiency. At the same time, the proposal ignores the underlying cause of the increasing cost of health insurance -- the increase in the actual costs of health care services.
OKLAHOMA: The second session of the 52nd Oklahoma Legislature convened in Oklahoma City on February 1. Legislators quickly turned to the state’s $1.3 billion budget deficit described by Governor Brad Henry (D) in his eighth and final state of the state address and FY 2011 executive budget. During his address, the Governor focused on his plans for resolving the $1.3 billion budget deficit through precise budget cuts. His only reference to health insurance was to encourage the expansion of Insure Oklahoma, a program developed by the state in partnership with small employers to provide affordable health coverage. The legislature is scheduled to adjourn on May 28 but only after addressing a range of legislation including several bills of interest to Aetna.
SOUTH DAKOTA: A dental fee schedule bill (S.B. 108) unanimously passed the Senate Commerce Committee and is expected to be taken up by the full Senate early this week. The bill prohibits any contract between a health insurer that offers a health benefit plan and a dentist from containing a provision that requires the dentist to accept a fee schedule for services unless the service is a covered service. Aetna will continue to follow the bill's progress as it progresses.
TENNESSEE: Several bills have been proposed that would make changes to the state's external review law. Aetna and other industry representatives will be meeting with the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance regarding its proposed changes to the external review law. The bill proposed by the TDCI most closely mirrors the model legislation proposed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
UTAH: The Speaker of the House has introduced a health reform bill addressing health information technology, individual and small group market reforms and transparency. The overarching theme of the reforms is micromanagement of rates and rating factors, and a broadening of the Insurance Commissioner's authority. The transparency provisions apply plan designs and benefit descriptions submitted by carriers, and would require providers to make available, upon request, a price list for services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis.
Owing to multiple blizzards in Washington, Congress started its President's Day recess a full week early and conducted no official business last week. However, there was some legislative drama as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid pulled the rug out from under Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus by scrapping the Baucus jobs bill (without warning), which contained many health insurance items, and replacing it with a stripped down, narrow jobs bill. Whether the health items Baucus originally inserted with Republican help will make it back to the table remains fuzzy. Among the health items that have been dropped are: the COBRA eligibility extension (to May 31); the “doc fix” (to October, 2010) of Medicare reimbursement rates; and the favorable statutory direction to CMS to calculate the 2011 Medicare Advantage rates "as if" the doc fix were in place.
States
California health insurance The Office of Patient Advocacy released a report card on the state’s HMOs last week. Aetna received 3 out of 4 stars. The goal of the report card is to allow consumers to compare how well health plans use personal medical records and help address conditions such as asthma, arthritis and diabetes.
COLORADO: Governor Bill Ritter held a press conference to announce what he calls "the next round of reforms that represent common sense." His legislative package includes bills to preclude insurance companies from charging different rates due to a person's gender, ensure that women have access to breast cancer screening, assure plain language is used in insurance forms, standardize insurance applications and explanations of benefits, and encourage greater use of online tools to enroll people in public programs. Apart from the Governor's proposals, a bill that would establish a public option was also introduced.
CONNECTICUT: In a short legislative session of only three months, the Insurance & Real Estate Committee wasted no time in putting forth an agenda that includes many concept drafts for repeat legislation from previous sessions. These include prohibiting health insurance copayments for preventive care, limiting prescription drug copayments, prohibiting Social Security disability payment offsets, and exempting the Municipal Employees Health Insurance Plans from the premium tax on small group premiums. In addition, the committee reintroduced legislation that includes nearly a dozen new health benefit mandates. The Council for Affordable Health Insurance, an independent think-tank, says that health insurance mandates could increase premiums in Connecticut by more than 50 percent overall.
GEORGIA: A bill was proposed last week that would impose significant restrictions on insurers' ability to rescind health insurance policies. Aetna, through the Georgia Association of Health Plans and AHIP, met with the legislator sponsoring the bill to express concerns with the bill.
INDIANA: The legislative session is at halftime, and the insurance agenda is now limited. Most insurance issue bills are officially dead, including a bill that would have prohibited health plan provisions requiring a contracted provider to accept more than a certain number of patients; coverage for dialysis treatment regardless of whether the facility is contracted or not and without certain benefit restrictions; and a bill that would have allowed out-of-network assignment of benefits. However, Aetna is expecting that a bill requiring insurer and HMO annual reporting of premium cost composition, including administrative costs, may be resurrected. A bill that restricts dental insurers and HMOs from establishing fee schedules for non-covered services passed the Senate, with our amendment to accommodate most of the key concerns expressed by opponents of the bill. As the bill stands, dental insurance plans may impose fee schedules for covered services, regardless of whether the plan actually pays for the services rendered.
KANSAS: An amended version of S.B. 389 related to dental services passed the Senate Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee on February 11. The amended bill prohibits any contract between a health insurer that offers a health benefit plan and a dentist from containing a provision that requires the dentist to accept a fee schedule for services unless the service is a covered service. Committee amendments added to the definition of a “health benefit plan” the following: any subscription agreement issued by a non-profit dental service corporation; any policy of health insurance purchased by an individual; the state children’s health insurance plan; and the state medical assistance program under Medicaid. We will continue to update you as this bill progresses and hope to make favorable changes as the bill moves through the House.
MASSACHUSETTS: Governor Deval Patrick filed a 40-page bill that proposes giving the insurance commissioner the power to hold public hearings on rate adjustments and essentially cap health care price increases. Rate increases for individuals would be held to the rate of medical inflation; those sold to employers with 50 or fewer workers could not exceed one and a half times the level of medical inflation. The legislation would also impose a two-year moratorium on any new health benefit mandates. Legislative leaders praised the intent of the governor’s plan but declined to promise support. Strong opposition is expected from medical provider groups. The Governor simultaneously announced emergency regulations to take immediate effect that will require health insurers to submit proposed small business rate increases for review by the state 30 days before they take effect. Several other proposed provisions include a requirement that insurers offer at least one coverage plan with a limited network of health care providers costing at least 10 percent less than health plans with access to more physicians. The Massachusetts Association of Health plans is lobbying in support of a bill introduced by Senate Insurance Chair Richard Moore that would create a cheaper health insurance product for small employers by capping payments to providers at just 10 percent above Medicare rates. The Massachusetts Medical Society is against that proposal.
MISSOURI: An autism coverage mandate bill was amended and “perfected” by the Senate and then sent to the Government Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Committee from which it must emerge before returning to the floor of the Senate. In addition to two mandate-related amendments, a third amendment to the bill allowing for limited cross border sales of health insurance also passed. In its current form, the bill contains a mandated offering of the coverage in the individual market. Coverage is limited to treatment ordered by a licensed physician or psychologist whose treatment plan the carrier is entitled to review every six months. Coverage for applied behavior analysis (ABA) is limited to $52,000 annually (down from the $72,000 as introduced) for persons under age 21. Meanwhile in the House, a bill containing significant language relating to the credentialing of autism service providers also passed. The bill also contains a mandate to offer coverage in the individual market and to groups of fewer than 25. Groups of 25 to 50 would be entitled to an exemption from the mandate if they could demonstrate an increase in premiums tied to the mandate. The bill limits annual coverage of ABA ($36,000 for children ages 3-9; $20,000 for children ages 9-21). Aetna will continue to monitor the status of these mandates, but it appears fairly clear at this point that something will pass on the issue of autism.
NEW JERSEY: Last week Governor Chris Christie declared a fiscal state of emergency calling a special session of the legislature to lay out his plan for dealing with state’s current $2.2 billion budget shortfall. His plan calls for significant cuts or eliminations across 375 state programs and withholding $500 million of state education aid. Of note on the program side is a $12.6 million reduction in Charity Care funding to hospitals, which pays for care to uninsured residents. In legislative action, the Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee held a three-hour public hearing on out-of-network reimbursement. Much of the hearing focused on the markedly higher billing practices of ambulatory surgery centers and one non-par hospital. Aetna presented testimony regarding its experience with the non-par hospital, citing their disparate year-over-year increase in charges compared to other similarly situated hospitals. Chairman Schaer indicated the committee will work over the next several months to craft a solution.
NEW YORK: With Democratic Senator Hiram Monserrate officially expelled from the Senate, the Democratic majority (31-30) now faces an uphill battle getting the 32 votes needed to pass legislation. However, both the Senate and the Assembly moved forward with a public hearing on the Executive Budget proposal for health, including the section mandating the prior approval of rate adjustments. The Health Plan Association testified on behalf of the industry. If enacted, Governor Paterson's proposal for an 85 percent medical loss ratio and a prior approval hearing process for all rate adjustments would essentially amount to government control of health insurance, undermining the private health insurance market in New York. Price controls would weaken health plan solvency, hurt providers and virtually eliminate innovation and efficiency. At the same time, the proposal ignores the underlying cause of the increasing cost of health insurance -- the increase in the actual costs of health care services.
OKLAHOMA: The second session of the 52nd Oklahoma Legislature convened in Oklahoma City on February 1. Legislators quickly turned to the state’s $1.3 billion budget deficit described by Governor Brad Henry (D) in his eighth and final state of the state address and FY 2011 executive budget. During his address, the Governor focused on his plans for resolving the $1.3 billion budget deficit through precise budget cuts. His only reference to health insurance was to encourage the expansion of Insure Oklahoma, a program developed by the state in partnership with small employers to provide affordable health coverage. The legislature is scheduled to adjourn on May 28 but only after addressing a range of legislation including several bills of interest to Aetna.
SOUTH DAKOTA: A dental fee schedule bill (S.B. 108) unanimously passed the Senate Commerce Committee and is expected to be taken up by the full Senate early this week. The bill prohibits any contract between a health insurer that offers a health benefit plan and a dentist from containing a provision that requires the dentist to accept a fee schedule for services unless the service is a covered service. Aetna will continue to follow the bill's progress as it progresses.
TENNESSEE: Several bills have been proposed that would make changes to the state's external review law. Aetna and other industry representatives will be meeting with the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance regarding its proposed changes to the external review law. The bill proposed by the TDCI most closely mirrors the model legislation proposed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
UTAH: The Speaker of the House has introduced a health reform bill addressing health information technology, individual and small group market reforms and transparency. The overarching theme of the reforms is micromanagement of rates and rating factors, and a broadening of the Insurance Commissioner's authority. The transparency provisions apply plan designs and benefit descriptions submitted by carriers, and would require providers to make available, upon request, a price list for services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Health Insurance Reform EasyToInsureME FEBRUARY 5 2010
This Week in Health Insurance Reform EasyToInsureME FEBRUARY 5, 2010
Despite proclaiming to focus on other issues, such as the economy and jobs, President Barack Obama injected new energy into the health insurance reform debate this week.
On Monday, President Obama held a Q&A session via YouTube in which he responded to questions submitted during his State of the Union address. He commented that "it is my greatest hope" to have health care reform legislation "not just a year from now, but soon." He also responded to criticisms regarding the lack of transparency around the reform negotiations.
On Tuesday, at a town-hall-style meeting in New Hampshire, President Obama rejected the notion that health care reform was dead, saying "we've got to punch it through." Further, on Wednesday, he met with Senate Democrats reiterating his commitment to reform and encouraging lawmakers to press forward. He also suggested that Republicans play at least some role in negotiating a final bill.
Health Care Reform Negotiations
Democrats Look for Path Forward: Recent statements made by Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) are the first concrete signs that Democrats have started working to revive comprehensive health care reform legislation. Rep. Rangel indicated to the media that lawmakers have begun writing a compromise bill based on the legislation passed by the Senate last December. The bill will incorporate changes agreed upon last month by White House negotiators and members of the House and Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) did not commit to a timeline for reform, but hopes that Democrats can agree to a path forward by next week. So far, he has been unable to identify compromise language that will win the needed 51 Senate votes.
At the same time, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) indicated that the House would vote on a small piece of the overall health care reform package next week. The proposed bill would overturn the insurance industry's exemption from federal antitrust laws. The Senate version of health care reform did not include this measure because Sen. Reid could not secure the 60 votes needed to include it; however, Sen. Reid indicated the Senate would reconsider the measure.
Additional Activities
President Obama's Budget Assumes Health Care Reform: On Monday, White House officials released a proposed $3.8 trillion 2011 budget including several measures aimed at improving health care:
· Hiring more fraud detectives to root out waste in Medicare and Medicaid
· Providing $25.5 billion to help state Medicaid programs swelling with enrollment due to unemployment
· Eliminating Congressional earmarks for building hospitals and other facilities, including $10 million for Alaska and $35 million for Mississippi
· Initiating or increasing funds for the following research projects:
o quality improvements for seniors with chronic conditions
o effective medical treatments for the costliest conditions
o expeditious ways to adopt electronic medical records
o medical fields such as genetic medicine that may provide breakthrough treatments.
Further, the budget assumes that some form of health care reform legislation will pass Congress. It includes a "reserve fund for health care reform" totaling $634 billion as a "down payment" for the legislation and also assumes that the reform effort will generate $150 billion in savings over 10 years.
States Begin Initiatives to Expand Coverage: With the fate of national health care reform in question, state legislators are pushing their own bills to expand coverage. Last Thursday, California's State Senate passed a measure to create a government-run health care system, ignoring a veto threat from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The measure is now with the State Assembly. Missouri legislators have introduced a similar bill to create a government-run plan whereas lawmakers in other states, including Virginia and New Jersey, are working to tweak existing state programs to expand coverage. Tight budgets in all of those states may hinder these efforts.
Virginia Senate Says No to Individual Mandates: On Monday, Virginia's Democratic-controlled State Senate passed measures that would make it illegal to enforce an individual health care mandate. This decision comes in direct conflict with the House and the Senate health care reform bills, both of which require all individuals to purchase health insurance.
Public Opinion
Majority of Americans Doubt Passage of Health Care Reform, but Growing Optimism: A survey released by the Pew Research Center on Wednesday shows growing optimism around the passage of health care reform. While the poll indicates that the majority of Americans (60 percent) do not believe health care reform legislation will pass this year, the figure is down from the 67 percent who said - just after a special Senate election was held last month in Massachusetts - that such legislation would not pass.
Poll Indicates Damage Done On Health Care Reform: A poll released Tuesday by Public Policy Polling shows that Republicans currently have the advantage over Democrats in the ballot races for Congress, regardless of the final outcome of health care reform. In general, the poll shows that 43 percent of voters surveyed would vote for a Republican, whereas 40 percent would vote for a Democrat. When asked about the implications of the health care overhaul.
* If health care reform passes, 45 percent would likely vote Republican and 40 percent would likely vote Democrat.
* If health care reform does not pass, 43 percent would likely vote Republican and 38 percent would likely vote Democrat.
The poll also shows that 36 percent of respondents support the President's health care reform effort, while 51 percent oppose it.
Looking Ahead
Currently there is no timeline for the development of a comprehensive health care reform package. However, Speaker Pelosi is moving forward with smaller pieces of the bill, starting next week with the repeal of the antitrust exemption for insurance companies.
Despite proclaiming to focus on other issues, such as the economy and jobs, President Barack Obama injected new energy into the health insurance reform debate this week.
On Monday, President Obama held a Q&A session via YouTube in which he responded to questions submitted during his State of the Union address. He commented that "it is my greatest hope" to have health care reform legislation "not just a year from now, but soon." He also responded to criticisms regarding the lack of transparency around the reform negotiations.
On Tuesday, at a town-hall-style meeting in New Hampshire, President Obama rejected the notion that health care reform was dead, saying "we've got to punch it through." Further, on Wednesday, he met with Senate Democrats reiterating his commitment to reform and encouraging lawmakers to press forward. He also suggested that Republicans play at least some role in negotiating a final bill.
Health Care Reform Negotiations
Democrats Look for Path Forward: Recent statements made by Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) are the first concrete signs that Democrats have started working to revive comprehensive health care reform legislation. Rep. Rangel indicated to the media that lawmakers have begun writing a compromise bill based on the legislation passed by the Senate last December. The bill will incorporate changes agreed upon last month by White House negotiators and members of the House and Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) did not commit to a timeline for reform, but hopes that Democrats can agree to a path forward by next week. So far, he has been unable to identify compromise language that will win the needed 51 Senate votes.
At the same time, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) indicated that the House would vote on a small piece of the overall health care reform package next week. The proposed bill would overturn the insurance industry's exemption from federal antitrust laws. The Senate version of health care reform did not include this measure because Sen. Reid could not secure the 60 votes needed to include it; however, Sen. Reid indicated the Senate would reconsider the measure.
Additional Activities
President Obama's Budget Assumes Health Care Reform: On Monday, White House officials released a proposed $3.8 trillion 2011 budget including several measures aimed at improving health care:
· Hiring more fraud detectives to root out waste in Medicare and Medicaid
· Providing $25.5 billion to help state Medicaid programs swelling with enrollment due to unemployment
· Eliminating Congressional earmarks for building hospitals and other facilities, including $10 million for Alaska and $35 million for Mississippi
· Initiating or increasing funds for the following research projects:
o quality improvements for seniors with chronic conditions
o effective medical treatments for the costliest conditions
o expeditious ways to adopt electronic medical records
o medical fields such as genetic medicine that may provide breakthrough treatments.
Further, the budget assumes that some form of health care reform legislation will pass Congress. It includes a "reserve fund for health care reform" totaling $634 billion as a "down payment" for the legislation and also assumes that the reform effort will generate $150 billion in savings over 10 years.
States Begin Initiatives to Expand Coverage: With the fate of national health care reform in question, state legislators are pushing their own bills to expand coverage. Last Thursday, California's State Senate passed a measure to create a government-run health care system, ignoring a veto threat from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The measure is now with the State Assembly. Missouri legislators have introduced a similar bill to create a government-run plan whereas lawmakers in other states, including Virginia and New Jersey, are working to tweak existing state programs to expand coverage. Tight budgets in all of those states may hinder these efforts.
Virginia Senate Says No to Individual Mandates: On Monday, Virginia's Democratic-controlled State Senate passed measures that would make it illegal to enforce an individual health care mandate. This decision comes in direct conflict with the House and the Senate health care reform bills, both of which require all individuals to purchase health insurance.
Public Opinion
Majority of Americans Doubt Passage of Health Care Reform, but Growing Optimism: A survey released by the Pew Research Center on Wednesday shows growing optimism around the passage of health care reform. While the poll indicates that the majority of Americans (60 percent) do not believe health care reform legislation will pass this year, the figure is down from the 67 percent who said - just after a special Senate election was held last month in Massachusetts - that such legislation would not pass.
Poll Indicates Damage Done On Health Care Reform: A poll released Tuesday by Public Policy Polling shows that Republicans currently have the advantage over Democrats in the ballot races for Congress, regardless of the final outcome of health care reform. In general, the poll shows that 43 percent of voters surveyed would vote for a Republican, whereas 40 percent would vote for a Democrat. When asked about the implications of the health care overhaul.
* If health care reform passes, 45 percent would likely vote Republican and 40 percent would likely vote Democrat.
* If health care reform does not pass, 43 percent would likely vote Republican and 38 percent would likely vote Democrat.
The poll also shows that 36 percent of respondents support the President's health care reform effort, while 51 percent oppose it.
Looking Ahead
Currently there is no timeline for the development of a comprehensive health care reform package. However, Speaker Pelosi is moving forward with smaller pieces of the bill, starting next week with the repeal of the antitrust exemption for insurance companies.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
This Week in Health Insurance Reform--Federal Legislative Overview
February 3, 2010 EasyToInsureME Ez2InsureME
House and Senate
House and Senate Democratic leaders remain at an impasse on merging their respective health care reform bills. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) stated that they will not move forward on any health care reform measures before Republican Scott Brown is sworn in as Massachusetts’ junior senator.
Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Both party leaders decided to wait and hear what President Obama was going to say about health reform in his first State of the Union Address on January 27. In it, he urged Congress to continue its work on health care reform and outlined his agenda that focused heavily on reviving the economy to boost employment and reduce the budget deficit.
In an excerpt on health care reform from President Obama’s speech, he states, “Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office – the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress – our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.”
The Republican response was given by newly-elected Governor Bob McDonnell at the Virginia State House. In an excerpt from his speech, McDonnell stated that “All Americans agree - we need a health care system that is affordable, accessible, and high quality. But most Americans do not want to turn over the best medical care system in the world to the federal government. Republicans in Congress have offered legislation to reform healthcare, without shifting Medicaid costs to the states, without cutting Medicare, and without raising your taxes.”
Health Care Reform Next Steps
Congressional leaders continue to consider options for moving forward on health reform legislation following President Obama’s State of the Union address. Serious consideration is being given to taking action – possibly as early as next week – on a number of narrowly focused bills, some of which may be structured with the goal of attracting bi-partisan support. Consideration of these bills is not intended to preclude action on comprehensive health reform at a later date.
One of the first bills likely to move to the House floor could be an antitrust bill that would repeal portions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act pertaining to health insurance issuers and medical malpractice issuers. This legislation was proposed last year in the Senate by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and in the House by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and is known as the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009. It was ultimately included in the House health care reform bill, but not in the Senate reform bill.
As we reported last week, one of the potential options for Democrats to pass health care reform legislation was to use the budget reconciliation process. Democratic leaders are purportedly continuing to weigh a two-track process in which the House would clear the Senate health bill and then the Senate would use the filibuster-proof reconciliation process to incorporate a series of compromises with the House. Senate Majority Leader Reid said this week, “[Budget reconciliation is] something that we’re looking at, very closely. That’s where a lot of the procedural problems come in. It’s real tough to do it the right way, and we don’t know how to do that yet.”
In the meantime, the House will continue to focus on smaller health care bills. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stated this week that her party will successfully complete their work on health care reform that they began last year. Pelosi said, “We’ll go through the gate. If the gate is closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in. But we’re going to get health care reform passed for the American people.”
House and Senate
House and Senate Democratic leaders remain at an impasse on merging their respective health care reform bills. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) stated that they will not move forward on any health care reform measures before Republican Scott Brown is sworn in as Massachusetts’ junior senator.
Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Both party leaders decided to wait and hear what President Obama was going to say about health reform in his first State of the Union Address on January 27. In it, he urged Congress to continue its work on health care reform and outlined his agenda that focused heavily on reviving the economy to boost employment and reduce the budget deficit.
In an excerpt on health care reform from President Obama’s speech, he states, “Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office – the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress – our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.”
The Republican response was given by newly-elected Governor Bob McDonnell at the Virginia State House. In an excerpt from his speech, McDonnell stated that “All Americans agree - we need a health care system that is affordable, accessible, and high quality. But most Americans do not want to turn over the best medical care system in the world to the federal government. Republicans in Congress have offered legislation to reform healthcare, without shifting Medicaid costs to the states, without cutting Medicare, and without raising your taxes.”
Health Care Reform Next Steps
Congressional leaders continue to consider options for moving forward on health reform legislation following President Obama’s State of the Union address. Serious consideration is being given to taking action – possibly as early as next week – on a number of narrowly focused bills, some of which may be structured with the goal of attracting bi-partisan support. Consideration of these bills is not intended to preclude action on comprehensive health reform at a later date.
One of the first bills likely to move to the House floor could be an antitrust bill that would repeal portions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act pertaining to health insurance issuers and medical malpractice issuers. This legislation was proposed last year in the Senate by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and in the House by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and is known as the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009. It was ultimately included in the House health care reform bill, but not in the Senate reform bill.
As we reported last week, one of the potential options for Democrats to pass health care reform legislation was to use the budget reconciliation process. Democratic leaders are purportedly continuing to weigh a two-track process in which the House would clear the Senate health bill and then the Senate would use the filibuster-proof reconciliation process to incorporate a series of compromises with the House. Senate Majority Leader Reid said this week, “[Budget reconciliation is] something that we’re looking at, very closely. That’s where a lot of the procedural problems come in. It’s real tough to do it the right way, and we don’t know how to do that yet.”
In the meantime, the House will continue to focus on smaller health care bills. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stated this week that her party will successfully complete their work on health care reform that they began last year. Pelosi said, “We’ll go through the gate. If the gate is closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in. But we’re going to get health care reform passed for the American people.”
Federal Government Issues Interim Final Regulations on MHPAEA
EasyToInsureME
On Friday, January 29, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury jointly issued significant new interim final regulations for implementing the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA).
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
The regulations are 154 pages long and will require detailed reviews of applicable plan documents and insurance policies, as well as current processes regarding management of mental health benefits, claims, and the relationship Plans have with outside organizations that provide and manage mental health and substance abuse benefits.
These are "interim” final regulations, meaning that they are essentially final but are nonetheless subject to later changes as the result of the official 90-day public comment period.
For purposes of enforcement, regulators have emphasized that they will take into account a health plan’s good faith efforts to comply with a reasonable interpretation of the statute for violations that may occur with implementations by the original Act deadline (plan year renewals on or after October 3, 2009). The interim final regulation generally applies to group health plans and health insurance issuers for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2010. Collective bargaining entities have a different applicability provision to align with their agreements.
The interim final rules provide substantial clarification as to the definitions and tests that must be used in establishing parity between mental health and substance use and medical/surgical benefits with respect to financial requirements and treatment limitations, as required under MHPAEA.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Health Insurance Quotes Reform Obamacare & Buying Individual Health Insurance
JANUARY 29, 2010
This Week in Health Care Reform
Following the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Massachusetts State Senate last week and the resulting loss of Senate Democrats' supermajority, lawmakers continue to pave the way for health care reform - with limited progress. In addition, polls indicate that the public would rather lawmakers focus more on the economy than on health care.
State of the Union Address
President Obama Gives State of the Union Address: On Wednesday evening, President Barack Obama delivered his first State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress. Having hoped to have a health care reform bill on his desk prior to his address, the President instead used his speech to encourage Congress to push forward on health care reform. Yet, he did not give specific guidance as to how to proceed with the legislation. Instead, he made it clear that his primary focus would be on jobs and the economy.
Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Buying Individual Health Insurance
Health Insurance News
Health Care Reform Negotiations
Democrats Still Seek Way Forward: While vowing not to give up, Democratic Senate leaders indicated Tuesday that they no longer felt pressure to move quickly on health care reform; and, in the wake of the Massachusetts election and in reaction to public opinion, they shifted focus to jobs and the economy. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) commented that there is "no rush" on health care and said that he and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) were working to map out a way to complete health care reform in the coming months. On Wednesday, Sen. Pelosi floated a two-pronged strategy to pass incremental changes now and pursue comprehensive reform later.
Some lawmakers have considered breaking up the legislation into smaller pieces that have bipartisan support. However, this option will prove challenging given the complexities and interdependencies of the measures. For example, lawmakers would like to include a measure that requires all insurance companies to insure those with pre-existing conditions; however, premiums will most likely increase unless there is an individual mandate.
Earlier this week, Democrats appeared to be coalescing around a different strategy through which Senate lawmakers would make changes to their bill to appease members of the House. The Senate would then pass the revised bill via reconciliation, which only requires 51 votes. Following that, the House would approve the revised bill, giving it to President Obama for his review. However, movement on this strategy stalled Tuesday when two centrist Senators, Sens. Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AK), indicated that they would oppose using reconciliation to bypass Republican support. Others, including Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), have suggested a "time out" on health care reform until there is a clear path forward.
In the GOP response to President Obama's State of the Union address, Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell said that Republicans share the Democrats' desire for health care reform, but do not agree with their proposed solutions. Republicans suggest that Democrats scrap the current proposals and start over with more Republican input on issues such as medical malpractice reform and selling insurance policies across state lines.
Republicans Call for Transparency: On Wednesday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee marked up a resolution presented by Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) which requested that the administration divulge documentation regarding the health care reform deals made with trade associations and a labor union. Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) said that while details remained to be worked out, he would support a narrowed version of the Republican request for White House records.
President Obama to Speak with House Republicans: President Obama will meet with House Republicans on Friday in response to an invitation to speak at their annual retreat in Baltimore that begins Thursday and ends Saturday. The meeting comes just after the President's State of the Union address, and members of the news media speculate that the meeting may spur more bipartisanship or potentially lead to even more tension between the two parties.
Interest Groups Call for Reform: With health care reform's fate in jeopardy, interest groups have voiced their support, encouraging Democrats to push forward with legislation. The AARP, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Consumers Union, Families USA and Service employees International Union sent a joint letter last Thursday urging Congress not to abandon comprehensive health care reform. Further, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops also sent a letter to Congress urging a push for reform.
Public Opinion
Polls Show Concern with Health Care Reform; More Focus on Jobs and Economy: Several polls were released this week that highlight the public's disenchantment with health care reform and anxiety around the struggling economy.
A new CNN/Opinion Research poll released Tuesday shows that only three in ten Americans say they want Congress to pass legislation similar to the bills currently being discussed in Congress. Forty-eight percent of Americans would like lawmakers to start again on a new bill, and 21 percent believe Congress should not work on bills that would change the current health care system. Further, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll released Wednesday found that 51 percent of Americans believe President Obama has paid "too little attention" to the economy and that 44 percent feel he has paid "too much attention" to his proposed health care overall.
In addition, a new USA Today/Gallup poll released late last week finds that most Americans call for a more bipartisan effort in health reform. A 55 percent majority of Americans say that President Obama and Congressional Democrats should suspend movement on health care reform and consider alternatives that would increase Republican support.
A poll released last weekend by the Washington Post , Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University's School of Public Health indicated that dissatisfaction with the direction of the country, including the Democrats' health care reform proposals, drove the outcome of the Massachusetts election. The post-election survey of Massachusetts state voters showed that overall 43 percent say they support the health care reform proposals advanced by President Obama and Congressional Democrats, while 48 percent oppose them.
A new poll released Monday from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that fears regarding the health care reform package increased significantly in December as members of the Senate finalized their bill. Thirty-three percent of respondents said they believed their access to care would worsen if the legislation passed, up from 25 percent in November. Forty-two percent said the country's finances would suffer under reform, compared with 34.6 percent in November.
Looking Ahead
Next week, the President will present his Budget to Congress (which includes health programs), after which Congressional hearings will commence. We expect health reform to be discussed in these sessions. While there remains no clear path forward for health care reform, Congressional leaders will continue to work to find a solution.
This Week in Health Care Reform
Following the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Massachusetts State Senate last week and the resulting loss of Senate Democrats' supermajority, lawmakers continue to pave the way for health care reform - with limited progress. In addition, polls indicate that the public would rather lawmakers focus more on the economy than on health care.
State of the Union Address
President Obama Gives State of the Union Address: On Wednesday evening, President Barack Obama delivered his first State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress. Having hoped to have a health care reform bill on his desk prior to his address, the President instead used his speech to encourage Congress to push forward on health care reform. Yet, he did not give specific guidance as to how to proceed with the legislation. Instead, he made it clear that his primary focus would be on jobs and the economy.
Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Buying Individual Health Insurance
Health Insurance News
Health Care Reform Negotiations
Democrats Still Seek Way Forward: While vowing not to give up, Democratic Senate leaders indicated Tuesday that they no longer felt pressure to move quickly on health care reform; and, in the wake of the Massachusetts election and in reaction to public opinion, they shifted focus to jobs and the economy. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) commented that there is "no rush" on health care and said that he and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) were working to map out a way to complete health care reform in the coming months. On Wednesday, Sen. Pelosi floated a two-pronged strategy to pass incremental changes now and pursue comprehensive reform later.
Some lawmakers have considered breaking up the legislation into smaller pieces that have bipartisan support. However, this option will prove challenging given the complexities and interdependencies of the measures. For example, lawmakers would like to include a measure that requires all insurance companies to insure those with pre-existing conditions; however, premiums will most likely increase unless there is an individual mandate.
Earlier this week, Democrats appeared to be coalescing around a different strategy through which Senate lawmakers would make changes to their bill to appease members of the House. The Senate would then pass the revised bill via reconciliation, which only requires 51 votes. Following that, the House would approve the revised bill, giving it to President Obama for his review. However, movement on this strategy stalled Tuesday when two centrist Senators, Sens. Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AK), indicated that they would oppose using reconciliation to bypass Republican support. Others, including Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), have suggested a "time out" on health care reform until there is a clear path forward.
In the GOP response to President Obama's State of the Union address, Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell said that Republicans share the Democrats' desire for health care reform, but do not agree with their proposed solutions. Republicans suggest that Democrats scrap the current proposals and start over with more Republican input on issues such as medical malpractice reform and selling insurance policies across state lines.
Republicans Call for Transparency: On Wednesday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee marked up a resolution presented by Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) which requested that the administration divulge documentation regarding the health care reform deals made with trade associations and a labor union. Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) said that while details remained to be worked out, he would support a narrowed version of the Republican request for White House records.
President Obama to Speak with House Republicans: President Obama will meet with House Republicans on Friday in response to an invitation to speak at their annual retreat in Baltimore that begins Thursday and ends Saturday. The meeting comes just after the President's State of the Union address, and members of the news media speculate that the meeting may spur more bipartisanship or potentially lead to even more tension between the two parties.
Interest Groups Call for Reform: With health care reform's fate in jeopardy, interest groups have voiced their support, encouraging Democrats to push forward with legislation. The AARP, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Consumers Union, Families USA and Service employees International Union sent a joint letter last Thursday urging Congress not to abandon comprehensive health care reform. Further, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops also sent a letter to Congress urging a push for reform.
Public Opinion
Polls Show Concern with Health Care Reform; More Focus on Jobs and Economy: Several polls were released this week that highlight the public's disenchantment with health care reform and anxiety around the struggling economy.
A new CNN/Opinion Research poll released Tuesday shows that only three in ten Americans say they want Congress to pass legislation similar to the bills currently being discussed in Congress. Forty-eight percent of Americans would like lawmakers to start again on a new bill, and 21 percent believe Congress should not work on bills that would change the current health care system. Further, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll released Wednesday found that 51 percent of Americans believe President Obama has paid "too little attention" to the economy and that 44 percent feel he has paid "too much attention" to his proposed health care overall.
In addition, a new USA Today/Gallup poll released late last week finds that most Americans call for a more bipartisan effort in health reform. A 55 percent majority of Americans say that President Obama and Congressional Democrats should suspend movement on health care reform and consider alternatives that would increase Republican support.
A poll released last weekend by the Washington Post , Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Harvard University's School of Public Health indicated that dissatisfaction with the direction of the country, including the Democrats' health care reform proposals, drove the outcome of the Massachusetts election. The post-election survey of Massachusetts state voters showed that overall 43 percent say they support the health care reform proposals advanced by President Obama and Congressional Democrats, while 48 percent oppose them.
A new poll released Monday from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that fears regarding the health care reform package increased significantly in December as members of the Senate finalized their bill. Thirty-three percent of respondents said they believed their access to care would worsen if the legislation passed, up from 25 percent in November. Forty-two percent said the country's finances would suffer under reform, compared with 34.6 percent in November.
Looking Ahead
Next week, the President will present his Budget to Congress (which includes health programs), after which Congressional hearings will commence. We expect health reform to be discussed in these sessions. While there remains no clear path forward for health care reform, Congressional leaders will continue to work to find a solution.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Health Care Reform Weekly EasyToInsureME health insurance quotes
Week of January 25, 2010
The sudden halt to health care reform's steady march forward came as a shock to many who saw an upset win by Republican Senator-elect Scott Brown in Massachusetts as all but impossible. But if many took delight in the election outcome's impact on health reform legislation, Aetna Chairman Ronald A. Williams made it clear in a New York Times story last week that the country still needs meaningful health care reform – reform that addresses access as well as affordability. Everyone benefits by health reform that gets at the factors driving soaring health care costs and the loss of coverage for so many Americans. While Congress thinks carefully about its next steps, Aetna will continue to support meaningful health care reform and continue to offer responsible solutions to legislative leaders.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The election of Republican Scott Brown as the new senator from Massachusetts has derailed the Congressional health care reform train, less because Brown denies Democrats the 60th filibuster-proof vote, though that is certainly a major result, and more because it collapsed the Democratic political house of cards by highlighting the power of independent voters and the frustrated anti-incumbent mood of the electorate. Whether Democrats can regroup from this wake-up call will consume their leadership from now until the November off-year elections. How Democrats handle, and how Republicans respond to, health care reform in the short term and other key priorities – such as jobs, the economy, energy and security – over the rest of the session will underscore all Congressional decisions from now until the first Tuesday in November. In short, the 2010 elections started in earnest with Brown's victory.
Once Democrats get past the shock of losing Kennedy's seat, they will have to grapple with health care reform, one way or the other. The early favorites, including passing the Senate bill "as is" in the House, have been dropped for now as Democrats recognize the political cost of ramming through something unpopular propelled by political muscle only. Passing a smaller, less invasive and mostly Democratic bill has only a slightly better chance, as Republicans are not too likely to "crossover" quite yet. There is a growing interest in using reconciliation (the 51-vote tactic) down the road to pass a Democratic-only bill, once the House and Senate Democratic leadership can agree to a single bill. And, there is the outside chance that Democrats will see the Massachusetts election as an imperative to craft a bipartisan bill with Republicans that can secure 70-plus votes in the Senate. Wednesday’s State of the Union speech, followed by the party issues retreats later in the week, will go a long way toward determining which path will be pursued.
The sudden halt to health care reform's steady march forward came as a shock to many who saw an upset win by Republican Senator-elect Scott Brown in Massachusetts as all but impossible. But if many took delight in the election outcome's impact on health reform legislation, Aetna Chairman Ronald A. Williams made it clear in a New York Times story last week that the country still needs meaningful health care reform – reform that addresses access as well as affordability. Everyone benefits by health reform that gets at the factors driving soaring health care costs and the loss of coverage for so many Americans. While Congress thinks carefully about its next steps, Aetna will continue to support meaningful health care reform and continue to offer responsible solutions to legislative leaders.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The election of Republican Scott Brown as the new senator from Massachusetts has derailed the Congressional health care reform train, less because Brown denies Democrats the 60th filibuster-proof vote, though that is certainly a major result, and more because it collapsed the Democratic political house of cards by highlighting the power of independent voters and the frustrated anti-incumbent mood of the electorate. Whether Democrats can regroup from this wake-up call will consume their leadership from now until the November off-year elections. How Democrats handle, and how Republicans respond to, health care reform in the short term and other key priorities – such as jobs, the economy, energy and security – over the rest of the session will underscore all Congressional decisions from now until the first Tuesday in November. In short, the 2010 elections started in earnest with Brown's victory.
Once Democrats get past the shock of losing Kennedy's seat, they will have to grapple with health care reform, one way or the other. The early favorites, including passing the Senate bill "as is" in the House, have been dropped for now as Democrats recognize the political cost of ramming through something unpopular propelled by political muscle only. Passing a smaller, less invasive and mostly Democratic bill has only a slightly better chance, as Republicans are not too likely to "crossover" quite yet. There is a growing interest in using reconciliation (the 51-vote tactic) down the road to pass a Democratic-only bill, once the House and Senate Democratic leadership can agree to a single bill. And, there is the outside chance that Democrats will see the Massachusetts election as an imperative to craft a bipartisan bill with Republicans that can secure 70-plus votes in the Senate. Wednesday’s State of the Union speech, followed by the party issues retreats later in the week, will go a long way toward determining which path will be pursued.
This Week in Health Insurance Reform EasyToInsureME.com
January 27, 2010
This Week in Health Reform--Federal Legislative Overview
House and Senate
Republican Scott Brown’s victory over Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) in the January 19 special election to fill the seat of the late Senator Edward Kennedy (D) is proving to be a game-changer for the health care reform debate. It is now unclear what Democrats can do to pass President Obama’s most important legislative agenda item. Even though the Democrats held a majority in the House and Senate this year, they failed to coalesce around a strategy to pass this legislation. Initially after Brown’s win, there were two options under discussion for moving forward on the current legislation.
- Have the House take up the Senate-passed bill and use the "reconciliation" bill process to "fix" several of the provisions the House finds unacceptable (e.g., the “Cadillac” tax, etc.). If the House passes the Senate bill, it will go directly to the President for his signature, with no further action needed in the Senate. A "reconciliation" bill, which would need only 51 votes in the Senate, could be passed either in tandem with the Senate bill or follow soon after.
.
- Scale back the health care reform bill. A scaled-back bill could include health insurance reforms, exchanges, as well as several other provisions and possibly could attract bipartisan support. While many Democrats are likely to view this approach as a major lost opportunity, leadership may determine this is the most viable approach.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
However, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) publicly stated on January 21 that the House does not have the 218 votes needed to pass the Senate version of the health care reform bill, which takes option number one (above) off the table.
While numerous private discussions are reportedly being held on the matter, at the outset it seems that Democrats’ only option for keeping the current legislation alive is to reach across the aisle to their Republican counterparts, most notably, moderate Senator Olympia Snow (R-ME). That would mean a more conservative bill, which could anger rank and file Democrats who are supportive of the legislation.
Although no plans have emerged for how to move forward, it now looks like Democrats will have to modify their plans. On the night of Scott Brown’s win in Massachusetts, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) – one of the biggest proponents for a single-payer health care system – said: "The only way to go forward is to take a step back. If there isn't any recognition that we got the message and we are trying to recalibrate and do things differently, we are not only going to risk looking ignorant but arrogant. I don't think it would be the worst thing to take a step back and say we are going to pivot to do a jobs thing," and include elements of health care reform in it, he said.
Rep. David Camp (R-MI), Ranking Member on the House Ways and Means Committee, declared Democrats’ health care overhaul legislation “dead” and said that instead of full-scale change Congress should take a “first step toward comprehensive reform” of the nation’s health care system.
Issue Overview: Nebraska Medicaid Deal
While key elements of the health care reform legislation remain in flux, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its cost estimate of the expansion of the State of Nebraska’s Medicaid Deal, negotiated by Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) who then voted for the Senate’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HR 3590.
The letter responds to a request from Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)), Ranking Member, House Committee on the Budget, asking if the cost estimate of the Senate health reform bill would change if all states received the same level of federal assistance for Medicaid as Nebraska receives under the bill.
The CBO stated on January 21 that the net spending for the Senate legislation would increase by $35 billion over ten years if all states received the same level of assistance as Nebraska.
Under the Senate’s provisions, non-elderly individuals with incomes below 133 percent of the federal poverty level would be eligible for Medicaid beginning in 2014. The federal government would pay the cost of covering newly eligible enrollees through 2016; and federal spending would be about 90 percent by 2019. The Senate legislation states that it would pay all Medicaid expansion costs to Nebraska beginning in 2014.Saturday, January 23, 2010
This Week in Health Care Reform EasyToInsureME health insurance
JANUARY 22, 2010
This Week in Health Care Reform
After months of public debate and private negotiations, health care reform discussions stalled following Tuesday's Senate vote in Massachusetts. The Democratic Senate lost its 60th vote supermajority when Republican Scott Brown was elected to the United States Senate in the Massachusetts special election.
Health Care Reform Negotiations Post-Massachusetts Special Election
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Massachusetts Election of Senate Republican Recasts Debate: Following the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Massachusetts Senate seat Tuesday night, Democratic leaders have been scrambling to revive what could now be a dying bill. The loss of the Democrat's 60th vote in the Senate opens up the legislation to a Republican filibuster - something the Democrats have managed to avoid thus far in the debate.
House and Senate Democrats met this week to discuss how to move forward with the reform legislation in light of this election and promised Wednesday that they would push ahead. There are a number of options that Democrats are considering, but at this point they have not charted their course.
On Wednesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attempted to rally House Democrats around a strategy to push the Senate bill through the House and onto President Barack Obama's desk so as to avoid the need to again secure 60 Senate votes. However, the Speaker indicated on Thursday morning that she did not believe she has the needed 218 House votes necessary to move forward. This option would have allowed lawmakersto then propose additional modifications to the approved legislation through a process called "reconciliation," which only requires 51 votes in the Senate.
Other remaining options:
1.
House and Senate Democrats could also quickly complete the merging of the two bills and vote on the combined package before Mr. Brown is sworn in.
2.
Democratic leaders could attempt to re-engage Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), the only Republican who voted for the Senate Finance Committee's bill passed in October. Democrats would need to allow her to amend the bill so that she could support its passage and give Democrats the needed 60th vote; or,
3. House and Senate Democrats could essentially start over in their respective chambers and propose scaled-back versions of the bill under "reconciliation" procedures or regular order. Reconciliation procedures would greatly limit the scope of the legislation to issues only related to raising or spending federal funds; therefore, many provisions, such as creating new insurance exchanges and an individual mandate, might be excluded.
President Obama seemed to indicate that he favors having House and Senate lawmakers start over again and produce a scaled-back bill. In addition, more moderate Senate Democrats - hesitant to push through such a huge partisan bill in light of the Massachusetts election - urged leaders to slow down.
Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) has called on Senate leaders to suspend voting on health care reform until Mr. Brown is sworn into office. President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have iterated this same message. Further, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) called for a bipartisan effort as the best way to achieve health care reform legislation.
Health Care Reform Negotiations Prior to Massachusetts Special Election
Senators Urge Guarantee of Government Savings: In a letter sent last Thursday to Sen. Reid, five Democratic Senators asked for the inclusion of a "fail-safe mechanism" in the final bill. This mechanism would give Congress "the tools to keep costs under control should the current savings estimates fail to materialize."
Both the Senate and House versions of the bill rely heavily on reductions in government spending, particularly around Medicare, to help pay for reform. Republicans and some nonpartisan analysts believe the government will not follow through on these spending reductions, which will lead to soaring costs.
President Obama Pushes for Less Protection for Biologic Drugs: Last Thursday President Obama pushed for a change in the health care reform legislation that would reduce the number of years that biologic drugs were patent protected from generic competition, previously set at 12 years. White House officials and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) were negotiating for 10 years protection or less.
Members of the news media speculated that the move to reduce biologic drug protections could be a leverage point for President Obama to pressure the drug industry to increase contributions to pay for health care reform. In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported that Congressional Democrats had already asked drug companies to contribute an additional $10 billion or more, over and above the $80 billion which the industry agreed to early on in the reform negotiations.
President Obama Strikes Deal with Unions: Last week Democratic negotiators struck a deal with union officials and conceded to union demands to scale back a tax on high-end insurance plans. The deal would exempt union workers from having to pay the tax until 2018, five years after the tax would apply to other workers. While the deal would help gain union support for the bill, it would also reduce the amount of tax revenue generated by about 40 percent, to $90 billion. As such, Democratic leaders would need to find other sources of revenue to make up the difference.
Public Opinion
Exit Poll Indicates Health Care Reform as Hot Button Issue: As the ballot polls closed on Tuesday night's Massachusetts Senate election, an exit poll conducted by Frabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates indicated that 52 percent of voters said that they oppose the federal health care reform measure and 42 percent said they cast their ballot to help stop President Obama from passing this legislation. In addition, 48 percent said that health care was the single issue driving their vote.
Polls Show Discontent: The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicated that almost half of Americans believe the health care reform bill in Congress is a bad idea (46 percent). This figure is up dramatically from April when only 26 percent believed the plan was a bad idea. Further, just 33 percent say the plan is a good idea. Nearly half of those surveyed (48 percent) believe that passing the current legislation would be a "step backward."
In addition, a new Quinnipiac University poll showed that public support for health care reform continues to decline. Thirty-four percent mostly approve, while 54 percent mostly disapprove. At the end of December, 53 percent of Americans mostly approved, while 36 mostly disapproved.
Looking Ahead
Currently, the path to health care reform is unclear. Democrats seek a way to secure the necessary votes to pass the legislation, and some now question the value of pushing such a large bill. President Obama had hoped to see a final bill prior to his State of the Union address, which has been scheduled for January 27; however, it appears this goal is likely out of reach.
This Week in Health Care Reform
After months of public debate and private negotiations, health care reform discussions stalled following Tuesday's Senate vote in Massachusetts. The Democratic Senate lost its 60th vote supermajority when Republican Scott Brown was elected to the United States Senate in the Massachusetts special election.
Health Care Reform Negotiations Post-Massachusetts Special Election
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Massachusetts Election of Senate Republican Recasts Debate: Following the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Massachusetts Senate seat Tuesday night, Democratic leaders have been scrambling to revive what could now be a dying bill. The loss of the Democrat's 60th vote in the Senate opens up the legislation to a Republican filibuster - something the Democrats have managed to avoid thus far in the debate.
House and Senate Democrats met this week to discuss how to move forward with the reform legislation in light of this election and promised Wednesday that they would push ahead. There are a number of options that Democrats are considering, but at this point they have not charted their course.
On Wednesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attempted to rally House Democrats around a strategy to push the Senate bill through the House and onto President Barack Obama's desk so as to avoid the need to again secure 60 Senate votes. However, the Speaker indicated on Thursday morning that she did not believe she has the needed 218 House votes necessary to move forward. This option would have allowed lawmakersto then propose additional modifications to the approved legislation through a process called "reconciliation," which only requires 51 votes in the Senate.
Other remaining options:
1.
House and Senate Democrats could also quickly complete the merging of the two bills and vote on the combined package before Mr. Brown is sworn in.
2.
Democratic leaders could attempt to re-engage Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), the only Republican who voted for the Senate Finance Committee's bill passed in October. Democrats would need to allow her to amend the bill so that she could support its passage and give Democrats the needed 60th vote; or,
3. House and Senate Democrats could essentially start over in their respective chambers and propose scaled-back versions of the bill under "reconciliation" procedures or regular order. Reconciliation procedures would greatly limit the scope of the legislation to issues only related to raising or spending federal funds; therefore, many provisions, such as creating new insurance exchanges and an individual mandate, might be excluded.
President Obama seemed to indicate that he favors having House and Senate lawmakers start over again and produce a scaled-back bill. In addition, more moderate Senate Democrats - hesitant to push through such a huge partisan bill in light of the Massachusetts election - urged leaders to slow down.
Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) has called on Senate leaders to suspend voting on health care reform until Mr. Brown is sworn into office. President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have iterated this same message. Further, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) called for a bipartisan effort as the best way to achieve health care reform legislation.
Health Care Reform Negotiations Prior to Massachusetts Special Election
Senators Urge Guarantee of Government Savings: In a letter sent last Thursday to Sen. Reid, five Democratic Senators asked for the inclusion of a "fail-safe mechanism" in the final bill. This mechanism would give Congress "the tools to keep costs under control should the current savings estimates fail to materialize."
Both the Senate and House versions of the bill rely heavily on reductions in government spending, particularly around Medicare, to help pay for reform. Republicans and some nonpartisan analysts believe the government will not follow through on these spending reductions, which will lead to soaring costs.
President Obama Pushes for Less Protection for Biologic Drugs: Last Thursday President Obama pushed for a change in the health care reform legislation that would reduce the number of years that biologic drugs were patent protected from generic competition, previously set at 12 years. White House officials and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) were negotiating for 10 years protection or less.
Members of the news media speculated that the move to reduce biologic drug protections could be a leverage point for President Obama to pressure the drug industry to increase contributions to pay for health care reform. In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported that Congressional Democrats had already asked drug companies to contribute an additional $10 billion or more, over and above the $80 billion which the industry agreed to early on in the reform negotiations.
President Obama Strikes Deal with Unions: Last week Democratic negotiators struck a deal with union officials and conceded to union demands to scale back a tax on high-end insurance plans. The deal would exempt union workers from having to pay the tax until 2018, five years after the tax would apply to other workers. While the deal would help gain union support for the bill, it would also reduce the amount of tax revenue generated by about 40 percent, to $90 billion. As such, Democratic leaders would need to find other sources of revenue to make up the difference.
Public Opinion
Exit Poll Indicates Health Care Reform as Hot Button Issue: As the ballot polls closed on Tuesday night's Massachusetts Senate election, an exit poll conducted by Frabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates indicated that 52 percent of voters said that they oppose the federal health care reform measure and 42 percent said they cast their ballot to help stop President Obama from passing this legislation. In addition, 48 percent said that health care was the single issue driving their vote.
Polls Show Discontent: The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicated that almost half of Americans believe the health care reform bill in Congress is a bad idea (46 percent). This figure is up dramatically from April when only 26 percent believed the plan was a bad idea. Further, just 33 percent say the plan is a good idea. Nearly half of those surveyed (48 percent) believe that passing the current legislation would be a "step backward."
In addition, a new Quinnipiac University poll showed that public support for health care reform continues to decline. Thirty-four percent mostly approve, while 54 percent mostly disapprove. At the end of December, 53 percent of Americans mostly approved, while 36 mostly disapproved.
Looking Ahead
Currently, the path to health care reform is unclear. Democrats seek a way to secure the necessary votes to pass the legislation, and some now question the value of pushing such a large bill. President Obama had hoped to see a final bill prior to his State of the Union address, which has been scheduled for January 27; however, it appears this goal is likely out of reach.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
This Week in Health Care Reform : EasyToInsureME Health Insurance
This Week in Health Reform
Republican Scott Brown’s victory over Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) in the January 19 special election to fill the seat of the late Senator Edward Kennedy (D) might prove to be a game-changer for the health care reform debate. The loss of the 60th Democratic vote now robs Senate Democrats of a filibuster-proof majority. Last week, Democrats were rushing to wrap up a House/Senate agreement on the bill, likely due to reports that Coakley’s lead had diminished.
Congressional leaders are still aiming to have the controversial points in the health care reform bill settled as soon as possible, so they can send the compromised bill to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for scoring. The CBO will then need 12 days to analyze the legislation.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
In addition to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), lawmakers participating in the White House meetings include: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-CA), Assistant Senate Majority Leader Richard Durbin (D-IL), Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT), Senate HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT).
A main point of contention between the two houses of Congress pertained to the
40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans passed by the Senate. Since many labor union members would be affected by the tax on high-cost health insurance plans, the House of Representatives was not supportive of this provision in the Senate bill. Union leaders have also been included in key negotiations on this provision, and on January 14, signaled that they are ready to support the merged legislation with the compromised provision.
The main revenue source for the Senate’s health care reform bill (H.R. 3590) would be from an excise tax – beginning in 2013 – on employer-provided, high-cost health insurance plans costing more than $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for a family. The reported compromise on the legislation now makes the tax kick-in on policies costing $8,900 for individuals and $24,000 for families. The tax threshold would still rise at inflation plus one percentage point, as is currently written in the Senate bill. Additionally, dental and vision benefits would be removed from the calculation of threshold costs, and plans offered by state and local governments, as well as plans covered by collective bargaining agreements, would be exempted from the excise tax until 2018. This would allow current agreements to expire and allow for negotiation of new contracts.
In an effort to make up the lack of revenue from the modification of the excise tax provision, leadership will have to come up with new funding to finance the merged bill. Some reports have mentioned that the pharmaceutical industry has agreed to provide more money than the $80 billion they have already negotiated with the White House. Medical device companies could also face additional fees. Portions of the main revenue source in the House bill – a Medicare payroll tax on wealthy U.S. residents – could be added as well.
On January 14, Richard Trumpka, president of the AFL-CIO, said, “Union leaders approached negotiations with the White House and congressional leaders with one overriding goal in mind – getting a bill signed into law.” Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), said, “We do like the way it’s shaping up, but it’s still not finished. We’ve got to see a final product.”
There also has been significant discussion – but no resolution so far – about the question of whether to establish a single national health insurance exchange or allow each state to operate its own exchange. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas continues to support a state-based approach to exchanges.
Republican Scott Brown’s victory over Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley (D) in the January 19 special election to fill the seat of the late Senator Edward Kennedy (D) might prove to be a game-changer for the health care reform debate. The loss of the 60th Democratic vote now robs Senate Democrats of a filibuster-proof majority. Last week, Democrats were rushing to wrap up a House/Senate agreement on the bill, likely due to reports that Coakley’s lead had diminished.
Congressional leaders are still aiming to have the controversial points in the health care reform bill settled as soon as possible, so they can send the compromised bill to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for scoring. The CBO will then need 12 days to analyze the legislation.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
In addition to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), lawmakers participating in the White House meetings include: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-CA), Assistant Senate Majority Leader Richard Durbin (D-IL), Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT), Senate HELP Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT).
A main point of contention between the two houses of Congress pertained to the
40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans passed by the Senate. Since many labor union members would be affected by the tax on high-cost health insurance plans, the House of Representatives was not supportive of this provision in the Senate bill. Union leaders have also been included in key negotiations on this provision, and on January 14, signaled that they are ready to support the merged legislation with the compromised provision.
The main revenue source for the Senate’s health care reform bill (H.R. 3590) would be from an excise tax – beginning in 2013 – on employer-provided, high-cost health insurance plans costing more than $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for a family. The reported compromise on the legislation now makes the tax kick-in on policies costing $8,900 for individuals and $24,000 for families. The tax threshold would still rise at inflation plus one percentage point, as is currently written in the Senate bill. Additionally, dental and vision benefits would be removed from the calculation of threshold costs, and plans offered by state and local governments, as well as plans covered by collective bargaining agreements, would be exempted from the excise tax until 2018. This would allow current agreements to expire and allow for negotiation of new contracts.
In an effort to make up the lack of revenue from the modification of the excise tax provision, leadership will have to come up with new funding to finance the merged bill. Some reports have mentioned that the pharmaceutical industry has agreed to provide more money than the $80 billion they have already negotiated with the White House. Medical device companies could also face additional fees. Portions of the main revenue source in the House bill – a Medicare payroll tax on wealthy U.S. residents – could be added as well.
On January 14, Richard Trumpka, president of the AFL-CIO, said, “Union leaders approached negotiations with the White House and congressional leaders with one overriding goal in mind – getting a bill signed into law.” Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), said, “We do like the way it’s shaping up, but it’s still not finished. We’ve got to see a final product.”
There also has been significant discussion – but no resolution so far – about the question of whether to establish a single national health insurance exchange or allow each state to operate its own exchange. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas continues to support a state-based approach to exchanges.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
This Week in Health Insurance Reform : EasyToInsureME
January 13, 2010
This Week in Health Reform
House and Senate
The Senate passed its health care reform legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009 (H.R. 3590) on December 24, 2009. With both pieces of legislation now passed – the House legislation, the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R 3962), was passed on November 7, 2009 – House and Senate leadership must now reconcile the differences. Instead of moving into the conference committee to reconcile the bills, Democratic leadership has agreed to implement a “ping-pong” approach where the House will take up the Senate bill, amend it, and then send it back to the Senate for approval. Reiterating his commitment to signing health care reform legislation by the State of the Union address (the date of the Address has not been confirmed yet), President Obama has met with key Democrats multiple times during the last week and is supportive of this approach, which is said to be an easier procedural tactic and will take less time.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) still has the challenge of maintaining the Democrats’ 60-vote majority for two procedural votes in the Senate. This first is a vote on a motion to proceed to debate the legislation and the second is a vote on cloture that will allow Senators to proceed to the vote itself. The final vote on the full legislation will only need 51 votes. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) needs 218 votes in the House of Representatives.
While the “ping-pong” approach may seem easier than holding a formal conference committee, there are still numerous provisions in the Senate bill that might prove to be contentious issues for Democrats trying to marry the two pieces of legislation. One main priority is the way both bills are financed. The House Democrats prefer a tax on the wealthiest U.S. residents, while Senate Democrats want to tax high-cost “Cadillac” health insurance plans. It is suggested that a hybrid of the two is most likely to appease both groups. Among other provisions, many House Democrats are not supportive of either bill’s language on abortion, stating that they have a coalition of 41 members who will vote against the legislation if the abortion provisions are not amended. Other differences include national exchanges proposed in the House, while the Senate would like to see state-based exchanges; higher subsidies for the lowest-income Americans and an expansion of Medicaid in the House legislation.
The full Senate remains on recess until January 19.
Overview: NAIC Writes Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid
On January 6, The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) wrote House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to provide their input as the House and Senate begin to reconcile the differences in their prospective health care reform bills.
In its letter, the NAIC highlights important points about the need for a strong individual mandate, the implications of health care reform in non-guarantee issue states, concern over Federal rate approval processes and minimum loss ratios (MLR) at 80 percent for the individual market, as well as comments about the importance of Congress focusing on proposed effective dates for numerous insurance market reforms. Other issues discussed include high-risk pools and new vouchers programs.
This Week in Health Reform
House and Senate
The Senate passed its health care reform legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009 (H.R. 3590) on December 24, 2009. With both pieces of legislation now passed – the House legislation, the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R 3962), was passed on November 7, 2009 – House and Senate leadership must now reconcile the differences. Instead of moving into the conference committee to reconcile the bills, Democratic leadership has agreed to implement a “ping-pong” approach where the House will take up the Senate bill, amend it, and then send it back to the Senate for approval. Reiterating his commitment to signing health care reform legislation by the State of the Union address (the date of the Address has not been confirmed yet), President Obama has met with key Democrats multiple times during the last week and is supportive of this approach, which is said to be an easier procedural tactic and will take less time.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) still has the challenge of maintaining the Democrats’ 60-vote majority for two procedural votes in the Senate. This first is a vote on a motion to proceed to debate the legislation and the second is a vote on cloture that will allow Senators to proceed to the vote itself. The final vote on the full legislation will only need 51 votes. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) needs 218 votes in the House of Representatives.
While the “ping-pong” approach may seem easier than holding a formal conference committee, there are still numerous provisions in the Senate bill that might prove to be contentious issues for Democrats trying to marry the two pieces of legislation. One main priority is the way both bills are financed. The House Democrats prefer a tax on the wealthiest U.S. residents, while Senate Democrats want to tax high-cost “Cadillac” health insurance plans. It is suggested that a hybrid of the two is most likely to appease both groups. Among other provisions, many House Democrats are not supportive of either bill’s language on abortion, stating that they have a coalition of 41 members who will vote against the legislation if the abortion provisions are not amended. Other differences include national exchanges proposed in the House, while the Senate would like to see state-based exchanges; higher subsidies for the lowest-income Americans and an expansion of Medicaid in the House legislation.
The full Senate remains on recess until January 19.
Overview: NAIC Writes Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid
On January 6, The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) wrote House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to provide their input as the House and Senate begin to reconcile the differences in their prospective health care reform bills.
In its letter, the NAIC highlights important points about the need for a strong individual mandate, the implications of health care reform in non-guarantee issue states, concern over Federal rate approval processes and minimum loss ratios (MLR) at 80 percent for the individual market, as well as comments about the importance of Congress focusing on proposed effective dates for numerous insurance market reforms. Other issues discussed include high-risk pools and new vouchers programs.
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Buying Individual Health Insurance EasyToInsureME
Making Health Insurance Shopping Easier
Buying individual health insurance on the EasyToInsureME site is very simple. When individuals and families get quotes on the site they will be provided with every carrier available in the U.S. and all the plans that come with them. This includes full brochures and documentation of each and every plan along with a search tool for participating doctors. To apply, an apply button is next to each plan and this will forward the shopper directly to the carrier’s website to submit an application. EasyToInsureME cannot view your private information it is secured with the carrier. (Read the rest of Buying individual health insurance here)
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Health Insurance Exchange Reform Weekly EasyToInsureME
DECEMBER 23, 2009
This Week in Health Reform
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), may just reach his goal of getting a health care reform package approved by the Senate by Christmas. This past week, Sen. Reid clinched the 60th vote needed to pass the legislation. As of this communication, he has scheduled the final Senate vote for 7 a.m. on Christmas Eve day. In an effort to shore up votes, Sen. Reid and his colleagues struck deals to overcome hot-button issues such as abortion funding.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health care reform
Health insurance Exchange
Senate Negotiations
Senate Eyes Finish Line: After weeks of rancorous debate and more than 20 straight days and nights spent negotiating on Capitol Hill, Senate lawmakers cleared all three major procedural hurdles prior to a final vote on the legislation.
* The first procedural motion passed on a 60-40 vote early Monday morning , ending debate on Sen. Reid's proposed amendments, called the "manager's package," and cutting off a Republican filibuster. The "manager's package" represented a series of last-minute deals and compromises to shore up support for the legislation.
* The second procedural motion to approve the "manager's package" passed 60-39 on Tuesday morning.
* The third motion came Wednesday and ended debate on the final legislation in a 60-39 vote, setting up the reform bill for a final vote just in time for Sen. Reid's Christmas deadline.
Sen. Reid Carves Out State-Specific Deals to Secure the 60 Votes: On Saturday, Sen. Reid secured the 60 votes needed to pass the historic legislation, winning over Sen. Ben Nelson, (D-NE), with an amendment to prevent federal subsidies from being used for abortions. Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing coverage for abortion. If states do offer coverage, enrollees must pay for abortion coverage separately - a compromise that has sparked criticism from both sides of the abortion divide. Sen. Nelson also secured other benefits for the state of Nebraska, including:
* Millions of dollars from the federal government to pay for the proposed cost of the Medicaid expansion in his state; and
* An exemption for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska from an annual fee on insurers.
Throughout his amendment package, Sen. Reid included several other state-specific deals to secure the 60 votes. Such last-minute deals have been criticized by Republicans, including:
* For Sen. Max Baucus, (D-MT), the package included a provision to help 2,900 residents of Libby, Mont., sign up for Medicare benefits. Many residents have asbestos-related illnesses;
* For Sen. Christopher Dodd, (D-CT), it included a measure to provide $100 million for the construction of a hospital at a public university;
* Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT), negotiated for $600 million in additional Medicaid benefits for his state over 10 years;
* Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I-VT), got a $10 billion increase for community health centers over a number of years;
* Sen. Mary Landrieu, (D-LA), procured at least $100 million in 2011 from the federal government for help with Medicaid; and
* For Sen. Bill Nelson, (D-FL), the package included a measure allowing some 800,000 Florida senior citizens currently enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans to keep their extra benefits.
Sen. Reid's negotiations also included:
* The removal of a 5 percent tax on elective cosmetic surgeries, and the inclusion of a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services;
* 12 years of patent protection for the makers of brand-name biotech drugs;
* An increase in the Medicare payroll tax percent of an additional 0.9 percent of income for those making $200,000 as an individual and $250,000 for couples;
* An exemption from taxes on high-value insurance plans for those with certain professions, such as firefighters, policemen, construction workers, emergency first responders and longshoremen;
* A provision allowing for doctors and hospitals in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming to get paid more than providers elsewhere; and
* About $1 billion extra in Medicaid payments for visiting nurses and other in-home or community services.
CBO Updates Estimates on Health Care Bill's Impact: In a letter sent to Sen. Reid, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that it had over-estimated the latest Senate health care bill's impact on deficit reduction during the second decade of enactment. The original estimate indicated the overhaul would yield deficit reductions by one-half percent of GDP; the revised estimates indicate a reduction of between one-quarter and one-half percent of GDP. The CBO confirmed that its estimate over the first 10 years remains accurate, reducing the deficit by up to $132 billion by 2019.
However, in a Wednesday letter to Sen. Jeffery Sessions, (R-AL), the CBO indicated that the current Senate bill may potentially double count the savings from Medicare as a means to pay for the Senate health care bill. In the letter, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf writes: "The key point is that the savings to the (Hospital Insurance) trust fund under the (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs." Republicans quickly jumped on the letter as proof that the Senate's bill will not decrease the federal deficit over time, but rather add to it.
Late last week, the CBO estimated that the revised Senate bill will cost $871 billion over the next decade to extend coverage to the uninsured. It would dramatically expand Medicaid and offer federal subsidies to those who lack affordable coverage through employers. The nation will pay for the overhaul with about $400 billion in new taxes and about $500 billion in cuts to programs such as Medicare.
Sen. Snowe Indicates "No" Vote: Despite many weeks of negotiations with Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine and several one-on-one meetings with President Barack Obama, Sen. Snowe indicated that she will vote against the Senate's legislation without significant changes. Sen. Snowe has been a pivotal figure in the health care reform debate as the only Republican to have voted for the Senate Finance Committee's bill, which passed in October. The loss of Sen. Snowe's support comes as a blow to Democratic leaders who were hoping to achieve some level of bipartisan support.
Other Activities
AMA, AHA, AARP and FAH Show Support; AHIP Opposes: On Monday, both the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Hospital Association ( AHA) sent letters to Sen. Reid indicating support for the latest version of the Senate health care bill, while highlighting requests for changes. The AMA, for example, hopes to see changes to the independent board that would be created to slow the growth of Medicare costs. Among other adjustments, the AHA requested a change that would lower Medicare payments to hospitals with high readmission rates. Endorsements also came from AARP and from the Federation of American Hospitals (FAH). In contrast, a statement Friday from America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) voiced opposition to the bill, citing cuts to Medicare Advantage programs and caps on insurers' administrative costs as problematic.
Public Opinion
December Polls Show Americans Disapprove: As a final vote on the Senate's health care reform package nears, Americans are increasingly wary of its impact. The December Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that:
* Only 35 percent of Americans said they would personally be better off if health care reform passes - down from 42 percent last month;
* Only forty-five percent of voters said the country would be better off with health reform - down from 54 percent last month.
The latest poll results released Tuesday from Quinnipiac University show that:
* Americans "mostly disapprove" (53 percent to 36 percent) of the Senate's plan;
* A majority (56 percent to 38 percent) disapprove of President Obama's handling of health care reform;
* Voters oppose (72 percent to 23 percent) using any public money in the health care overhaul to pay for abortions;
* Americans support (56 percent to 38 percent) giving people the option of coverage by a government health insurance plan; and
* A majority (64 percent to 30 percent) support allowing younger people to buy into Medicare.
As a volatile year in health care reform comes to a close, an average of monthly polls since April shows that 82 percent of Americans say an overhaul of the nation's health care system is important for recharging the economy. However, in the most recent Robert Wood Johnson Foundation poll taken in November, 60 percent said an overhaul will not affect their personal access to health care or their family finances, and only about 40 percent said a revamping will improve access to care in the nation overall. Further, only about 30 percent believe health care reform will help the county's financial status.
Looking Ahead
Senate lawmakers are expected to vote on their final health care reform legislation early Thursday morning, setting the stage for reconciliation with the House bill passed in November. When lawmakers return from holiday break in January, the conference committee between the two chambers is expected to begin discussions about merging the two bills. Leaders of the House and Senate had hoped to have a final bill approved by Congress and sent to President Obama before the State of the Union address, scheduled for late January or early February. However, White House officials now indicate that given January's tight legislative calendar, this timeframe is unlikely.
This Week in Health Reform
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), may just reach his goal of getting a health care reform package approved by the Senate by Christmas. This past week, Sen. Reid clinched the 60th vote needed to pass the legislation. As of this communication, he has scheduled the final Senate vote for 7 a.m. on Christmas Eve day. In an effort to shore up votes, Sen. Reid and his colleagues struck deals to overcome hot-button issues such as abortion funding.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health care reform
Health insurance Exchange
Senate Negotiations
Senate Eyes Finish Line: After weeks of rancorous debate and more than 20 straight days and nights spent negotiating on Capitol Hill, Senate lawmakers cleared all three major procedural hurdles prior to a final vote on the legislation.
* The first procedural motion passed on a 60-40 vote early Monday morning , ending debate on Sen. Reid's proposed amendments, called the "manager's package," and cutting off a Republican filibuster. The "manager's package" represented a series of last-minute deals and compromises to shore up support for the legislation.
* The second procedural motion to approve the "manager's package" passed 60-39 on Tuesday morning.
* The third motion came Wednesday and ended debate on the final legislation in a 60-39 vote, setting up the reform bill for a final vote just in time for Sen. Reid's Christmas deadline.
Sen. Reid Carves Out State-Specific Deals to Secure the 60 Votes: On Saturday, Sen. Reid secured the 60 votes needed to pass the historic legislation, winning over Sen. Ben Nelson, (D-NE), with an amendment to prevent federal subsidies from being used for abortions. Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing coverage for abortion. If states do offer coverage, enrollees must pay for abortion coverage separately - a compromise that has sparked criticism from both sides of the abortion divide. Sen. Nelson also secured other benefits for the state of Nebraska, including:
* Millions of dollars from the federal government to pay for the proposed cost of the Medicaid expansion in his state; and
* An exemption for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska from an annual fee on insurers.
Throughout his amendment package, Sen. Reid included several other state-specific deals to secure the 60 votes. Such last-minute deals have been criticized by Republicans, including:
* For Sen. Max Baucus, (D-MT), the package included a provision to help 2,900 residents of Libby, Mont., sign up for Medicare benefits. Many residents have asbestos-related illnesses;
* For Sen. Christopher Dodd, (D-CT), it included a measure to provide $100 million for the construction of a hospital at a public university;
* Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT), negotiated for $600 million in additional Medicaid benefits for his state over 10 years;
* Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I-VT), got a $10 billion increase for community health centers over a number of years;
* Sen. Mary Landrieu, (D-LA), procured at least $100 million in 2011 from the federal government for help with Medicaid; and
* For Sen. Bill Nelson, (D-FL), the package included a measure allowing some 800,000 Florida senior citizens currently enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans to keep their extra benefits.
Sen. Reid's negotiations also included:
* The removal of a 5 percent tax on elective cosmetic surgeries, and the inclusion of a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services;
* 12 years of patent protection for the makers of brand-name biotech drugs;
* An increase in the Medicare payroll tax percent of an additional 0.9 percent of income for those making $200,000 as an individual and $250,000 for couples;
* An exemption from taxes on high-value insurance plans for those with certain professions, such as firefighters, policemen, construction workers, emergency first responders and longshoremen;
* A provision allowing for doctors and hospitals in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming to get paid more than providers elsewhere; and
* About $1 billion extra in Medicaid payments for visiting nurses and other in-home or community services.
CBO Updates Estimates on Health Care Bill's Impact: In a letter sent to Sen. Reid, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that it had over-estimated the latest Senate health care bill's impact on deficit reduction during the second decade of enactment. The original estimate indicated the overhaul would yield deficit reductions by one-half percent of GDP; the revised estimates indicate a reduction of between one-quarter and one-half percent of GDP. The CBO confirmed that its estimate over the first 10 years remains accurate, reducing the deficit by up to $132 billion by 2019.
However, in a Wednesday letter to Sen. Jeffery Sessions, (R-AL), the CBO indicated that the current Senate bill may potentially double count the savings from Medicare as a means to pay for the Senate health care bill. In the letter, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf writes: "The key point is that the savings to the (Hospital Insurance) trust fund under the (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs." Republicans quickly jumped on the letter as proof that the Senate's bill will not decrease the federal deficit over time, but rather add to it.
Late last week, the CBO estimated that the revised Senate bill will cost $871 billion over the next decade to extend coverage to the uninsured. It would dramatically expand Medicaid and offer federal subsidies to those who lack affordable coverage through employers. The nation will pay for the overhaul with about $400 billion in new taxes and about $500 billion in cuts to programs such as Medicare.
Sen. Snowe Indicates "No" Vote: Despite many weeks of negotiations with Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine and several one-on-one meetings with President Barack Obama, Sen. Snowe indicated that she will vote against the Senate's legislation without significant changes. Sen. Snowe has been a pivotal figure in the health care reform debate as the only Republican to have voted for the Senate Finance Committee's bill, which passed in October. The loss of Sen. Snowe's support comes as a blow to Democratic leaders who were hoping to achieve some level of bipartisan support.
Other Activities
AMA, AHA, AARP and FAH Show Support; AHIP Opposes: On Monday, both the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Hospital Association ( AHA) sent letters to Sen. Reid indicating support for the latest version of the Senate health care bill, while highlighting requests for changes. The AMA, for example, hopes to see changes to the independent board that would be created to slow the growth of Medicare costs. Among other adjustments, the AHA requested a change that would lower Medicare payments to hospitals with high readmission rates. Endorsements also came from AARP and from the Federation of American Hospitals (FAH). In contrast, a statement Friday from America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) voiced opposition to the bill, citing cuts to Medicare Advantage programs and caps on insurers' administrative costs as problematic.
Public Opinion
December Polls Show Americans Disapprove: As a final vote on the Senate's health care reform package nears, Americans are increasingly wary of its impact. The December Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that:
* Only 35 percent of Americans said they would personally be better off if health care reform passes - down from 42 percent last month;
* Only forty-five percent of voters said the country would be better off with health reform - down from 54 percent last month.
The latest poll results released Tuesday from Quinnipiac University show that:
* Americans "mostly disapprove" (53 percent to 36 percent) of the Senate's plan;
* A majority (56 percent to 38 percent) disapprove of President Obama's handling of health care reform;
* Voters oppose (72 percent to 23 percent) using any public money in the health care overhaul to pay for abortions;
* Americans support (56 percent to 38 percent) giving people the option of coverage by a government health insurance plan; and
* A majority (64 percent to 30 percent) support allowing younger people to buy into Medicare.
As a volatile year in health care reform comes to a close, an average of monthly polls since April shows that 82 percent of Americans say an overhaul of the nation's health care system is important for recharging the economy. However, in the most recent Robert Wood Johnson Foundation poll taken in November, 60 percent said an overhaul will not affect their personal access to health care or their family finances, and only about 40 percent said a revamping will improve access to care in the nation overall. Further, only about 30 percent believe health care reform will help the county's financial status.
Looking Ahead
Senate lawmakers are expected to vote on their final health care reform legislation early Thursday morning, setting the stage for reconciliation with the House bill passed in November. When lawmakers return from holiday break in January, the conference committee between the two chambers is expected to begin discussions about merging the two bills. Leaders of the House and Senate had hoped to have a final bill approved by Congress and sent to President Obama before the State of the Union address, scheduled for late January or early February. However, White House officials now indicate that given January's tight legislative calendar, this timeframe is unlikely.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Health Insurance Quotes Reform Final Vote EasyToInsureME
In the past week, the Senate’s health care reform legislation has run the political gauntlet, with Republicans trying to filibuster other legislation to create a roadblock, liberal Democrats complaining loudly about the loss of some favorite provisions, and independent-minded Democrats forcing some significant changes. But the holiday break and the President’s stated goals have given Senate Democrats powerful motivation to get health care reform to a vote this week. Regardless of what happens in the Senate this week, the House has adjourned, which means that the health reform debate will certainly carry over into 2010. Conference committee deliberations between House and Senate leaders are expected to be difficult. (Read the rest of Health Insurance Quotes Reform Final Vote here)
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Friday, December 18, 2009
Individual Health Insurance Reform EasyToInsureME
December 17, 2009
It appears that the U.S. Senate will vote to close debate on its version of federal health care reform as early as this weekend. Whether or not you have contacted your senators previously, now is the time for you to consider contacting both of your senators and encourage them to continue debate and to improve the legislation.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Individual health insurance
Health insurance quote
It is difficult to overstate the negative implications of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-NV) proposal. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this legislation - if enacted - will have a significant, negative impact on the cost and nature of coverage for our customers. The administration's chief actuary for Medicare and Medicaid Services has determined that if the Senate health care bill became law, it would increase national health care spending more than if we did nothing. Our own analysis concurs with these assessments and further indicates that Sen. Reid's proposal will likely lead to higher premiums for many of our customers without reducing the growth in underlying health care costs.
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll indicates that 53% of Americans understand that their personal costs will increase under this proposal and only 37% believe that their personal health care will improve under this legislation. The Senate needs to set aside this version of health care reform and construct a proposal that has broad and deep public support.
Throughout the health care reform debate, our company has sought to partner with our elected leaders in both parties to pursue responsible, sustainable reform that lowers costs and increases access. The current legislation does not meet these goals and Congress needs to hear from individuals who are concerned about the consequences of well-intended but flawed reforms.
While we continue to support health care reform, we cannot support reform that fails to address the cost and quality issues in our health care delivery system and undermines the bipartisan consensus for responsible and sustainable reform.
The holiday season is a busy time for all. Now is the time to get involved today.
The Senate needs to hear from you and time is short.
It appears that the U.S. Senate will vote to close debate on its version of federal health care reform as early as this weekend. Whether or not you have contacted your senators previously, now is the time for you to consider contacting both of your senators and encourage them to continue debate and to improve the legislation.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Individual health insurance
Health insurance quote
It is difficult to overstate the negative implications of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-NV) proposal. According to the Congressional Budget Office, this legislation - if enacted - will have a significant, negative impact on the cost and nature of coverage for our customers. The administration's chief actuary for Medicare and Medicaid Services has determined that if the Senate health care bill became law, it would increase national health care spending more than if we did nothing. Our own analysis concurs with these assessments and further indicates that Sen. Reid's proposal will likely lead to higher premiums for many of our customers without reducing the growth in underlying health care costs.
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll indicates that 53% of Americans understand that their personal costs will increase under this proposal and only 37% believe that their personal health care will improve under this legislation. The Senate needs to set aside this version of health care reform and construct a proposal that has broad and deep public support.
Throughout the health care reform debate, our company has sought to partner with our elected leaders in both parties to pursue responsible, sustainable reform that lowers costs and increases access. The current legislation does not meet these goals and Congress needs to hear from individuals who are concerned about the consequences of well-intended but flawed reforms.
While we continue to support health care reform, we cannot support reform that fails to address the cost and quality issues in our health care delivery system and undermines the bipartisan consensus for responsible and sustainable reform.
The holiday season is a busy time for all. Now is the time to get involved today.
The Senate needs to hear from you and time is short.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Health Insurance Quotes Reform Weekly EasyToInsureME
Week of December 14, 2009
Health care reform provisions are changing fast as the Senate considers numerous amendments on the floor, and there is no better example of how fast than the much-reported government plan option. Senate leaders announced last week that a deal had been struck to remove the public plan from the bill in favor of a not-for-profit private insurance option and an expansion of Medicare to allow people 55 or older to buy in. The deal was quickly lauded by the White House and others, but concerns soon emerged about the new approach from various sectors of the health care system. A day or two later, the Associated Press reported that Senate Democrats were changing the "breakthrough" provisions in response to those concerns. The anticipated impact of the reform bill (especially its raft of proposed health care sector taxes and fees) on costs continues to be the focus of most critics, from labor unions to hospitals.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The Senate last week barely moved forward on health care reform. Although the Senate focused on health care issues the entire week, there were no votes past Tuesday and the key amendment of the week (reimportation of cheaper drugs from Canada and overseas) is in limbo though the amendment clearly has majority support. Off the floor the action is more intense and meaningful. Earlier in the week Majority Leader Harry Reid announced a "deal" on the public plan. As it turned out the deal was among 10 Democrats only, and no details of any consequence were released. Reid himself was closed-mouthed claiming everyone had to wait until the CBO had a chance to "score" this newest iteration of health reform. The deal is in three parts: 1) use of the Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan model in which a federal agency would administer a national plan with private carriers in the mix; 2) triggering a true public plan if too few carriers participate in this national plan; and 3) allowing seniors 55 to 64 years old to buy in to Medicare. Even before the CBO score is back we already know that Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) is opposed to the Medicare piece alone, if not the rest, and would filibuster the overall bill; Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) is not far behind. And, if the score is bad and turns away additional moderate Democrats, Reid may have to go back to the drawing board for yet another twist to the never-ending saga of health care reform.
States
FLORIDA: A final draft of the voluntary compact regarding coverage for cancer clinical trials was circulated to interested parties late last week by legislative leadership. Aetna has been working with leadership, both directly and through the Florida Association of Health Plans, to assure the language follows current coverage guidelines. Aetna anticipates being a signatory to the compact.
MASSACHUSETTS: The Massachusetts Joint Health Care Financing Committee held a hearing on legislation requiring every full-and part-time college student in Massachusetts to have at least the basic level of health insurance required under the state's 2006 health reform law. If enacted, the new law would require students to carry the minimum credible coverage to be considered insured. Universities and colleges that fail to carry out their "responsibilities" to ensure student compliance would be fined a penalty of $1 per student for every day their "failure" continues. The bill also would require the Division of Insurance to issue regulations establishing procedures for implementation and monitoring of compliance. Massachusetts' existing individual mandate applies to students age 18 or older who pay in-state tuition rates for themselves at a Massachusetts community college, state college, or university.
MISSOURI: The pre-filing of bills for the second regular session of the Missouri 95th General Assembly began on December 1, and several new bills concern federal health care reform. Several pre-filed bills that failed to pass in the first regular session included an autism spectrum disorder mandate as well as a bill to amend the current prompt-pay statute. Both are expected to continue to be debated again in 2010. New to the Assembly are bills to pursue a constitutional amendment to prohibit compelling a patient, employer or health care provider to participate in any government- or privately run health system and to prohibit banning a person or employer from paying directly for legal health care services. Another new bill would pursue a constitutional amendment to penalize a political subdivision for participating in a health insurance option sponsored by the federal government. New also is a bill to provide premium refunds for consumers with cancelled long-term care and/or Medicare supplement policies and to make it an unfair trade practice to engage in certain practices when selling Medicare products. Aetna will continue to monitor the pre-filing of bills through the start of the next legislative session in January 2010.
NEW YORK: In a press release issued last week, Governor David Paterson is calling for the reinstatement of prior approval of insurance premium rates. The Governor introduced a bill during 2009 that would have given the Superintendent of Insurance sole authority to approve rates at his or her discretion, but that bill failed to pass. Given this latest press statement, it is expected that the Governor will ask the legislature to re-introduce his program bill for 2010. The Governor tied his support for the prior approval of rates to plans' dividend requests. The dividend requests were $800 million from Oxford (18.7 percent of 2008 New York premiums), $200 million from Empire (2.5 percent) and $134 million from Aetna (16 percent). The state's insurance lobby, the HPA, responded that the dividends reflect multiple years' earnings, and the plans' margins are in the 2 percent to 3 percent range.
OHIO: Resolutions continue to be introduced in Ohio with respect to implementation of anticipated federal health care reform. Specifically, a new resolution was recently introduced requesting all members of the General Assembly to support the public plan option as part of national health care reform. This resolution adds to other pending resolutions on health care reform, such as one supporting rights for people to enter into private contracts with health care providers for health care services and to purchase private health care coverage; and another to amend Ohio's Constitution to prohibit a law or rule from compelling a person, employer, or health care provider to participate in a health care system. They are not expected to pass, as the legislature continues to focus mainly on budgetary matters.
OKLAHOMA: While testifying at a hearing before the House Appropriations and Budget Subcommittee, the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector suggested eliminating all health insurance options except for “HealthChoice” to cut $100 million in state employee benefits costs. Currently state employees can enroll in one of eight health insurance plans offered by four HMOs through the Employees Benefits Council or one of the HealthChoice plans offered by the Oklahoma State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board. Employees receive an allowance to offset the costs of the plans. According to state law, the allowance is calculated based on the average cost of the high-option health insurance plans, plus the average of the dental plan costs, plus the cost of life insurance, plus the cost of disability insurance, plus 75 percent of the dependent health costs, if applicable. Steve Burrage said the current arrangement creates a situation of "adverse selection" where healthy, younger employees purchase the less expensive health insurance policies offered by the HMOs, and less healthy, older employees buy the more expensive HealthChoice policies. However, both employees receive the same benefit allowance. In his FY2009 executive budget, Governor Brad Henry proposed adjusting the benefit allowance formula by giving the HealthChoice high-option plan a 40 percent weight. The proposed adjustment did not make it into the final budget.
WISCONSIN: Proposed legislation is circulating in the Senate that would create explicit statutory authority for the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) to oversee operation of self-funded plans serving public-sector employees, resolve consumer complaints, and monitor reserve and reinsurance levels. Additionally, the bill would apply state minimum coverage requirements, such as mammograms, chiropractic care, diabetes education and care, and require a governmental body that provides a self-funded health plan to provide reports and replies to requests for information to the OCI as they relate to the plan. This bill is aimed at self-funded plans offered by cities, towns, villages, counties and school districts.
Health care reform provisions are changing fast as the Senate considers numerous amendments on the floor, and there is no better example of how fast than the much-reported government plan option. Senate leaders announced last week that a deal had been struck to remove the public plan from the bill in favor of a not-for-profit private insurance option and an expansion of Medicare to allow people 55 or older to buy in. The deal was quickly lauded by the White House and others, but concerns soon emerged about the new approach from various sectors of the health care system. A day or two later, the Associated Press reported that Senate Democrats were changing the "breakthrough" provisions in response to those concerns. The anticipated impact of the reform bill (especially its raft of proposed health care sector taxes and fees) on costs continues to be the focus of most critics, from labor unions to hospitals.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The Senate last week barely moved forward on health care reform. Although the Senate focused on health care issues the entire week, there were no votes past Tuesday and the key amendment of the week (reimportation of cheaper drugs from Canada and overseas) is in limbo though the amendment clearly has majority support. Off the floor the action is more intense and meaningful. Earlier in the week Majority Leader Harry Reid announced a "deal" on the public plan. As it turned out the deal was among 10 Democrats only, and no details of any consequence were released. Reid himself was closed-mouthed claiming everyone had to wait until the CBO had a chance to "score" this newest iteration of health reform. The deal is in three parts: 1) use of the Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan model in which a federal agency would administer a national plan with private carriers in the mix; 2) triggering a true public plan if too few carriers participate in this national plan; and 3) allowing seniors 55 to 64 years old to buy in to Medicare. Even before the CBO score is back we already know that Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) is opposed to the Medicare piece alone, if not the rest, and would filibuster the overall bill; Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) is not far behind. And, if the score is bad and turns away additional moderate Democrats, Reid may have to go back to the drawing board for yet another twist to the never-ending saga of health care reform.
States
FLORIDA: A final draft of the voluntary compact regarding coverage for cancer clinical trials was circulated to interested parties late last week by legislative leadership. Aetna has been working with leadership, both directly and through the Florida Association of Health Plans, to assure the language follows current coverage guidelines. Aetna anticipates being a signatory to the compact.
MASSACHUSETTS: The Massachusetts Joint Health Care Financing Committee held a hearing on legislation requiring every full-and part-time college student in Massachusetts to have at least the basic level of health insurance required under the state's 2006 health reform law. If enacted, the new law would require students to carry the minimum credible coverage to be considered insured. Universities and colleges that fail to carry out their "responsibilities" to ensure student compliance would be fined a penalty of $1 per student for every day their "failure" continues. The bill also would require the Division of Insurance to issue regulations establishing procedures for implementation and monitoring of compliance. Massachusetts' existing individual mandate applies to students age 18 or older who pay in-state tuition rates for themselves at a Massachusetts community college, state college, or university.
MISSOURI: The pre-filing of bills for the second regular session of the Missouri 95th General Assembly began on December 1, and several new bills concern federal health care reform. Several pre-filed bills that failed to pass in the first regular session included an autism spectrum disorder mandate as well as a bill to amend the current prompt-pay statute. Both are expected to continue to be debated again in 2010. New to the Assembly are bills to pursue a constitutional amendment to prohibit compelling a patient, employer or health care provider to participate in any government- or privately run health system and to prohibit banning a person or employer from paying directly for legal health care services. Another new bill would pursue a constitutional amendment to penalize a political subdivision for participating in a health insurance option sponsored by the federal government. New also is a bill to provide premium refunds for consumers with cancelled long-term care and/or Medicare supplement policies and to make it an unfair trade practice to engage in certain practices when selling Medicare products. Aetna will continue to monitor the pre-filing of bills through the start of the next legislative session in January 2010.
NEW YORK: In a press release issued last week, Governor David Paterson is calling for the reinstatement of prior approval of insurance premium rates. The Governor introduced a bill during 2009 that would have given the Superintendent of Insurance sole authority to approve rates at his or her discretion, but that bill failed to pass. Given this latest press statement, it is expected that the Governor will ask the legislature to re-introduce his program bill for 2010. The Governor tied his support for the prior approval of rates to plans' dividend requests. The dividend requests were $800 million from Oxford (18.7 percent of 2008 New York premiums), $200 million from Empire (2.5 percent) and $134 million from Aetna (16 percent). The state's insurance lobby, the HPA, responded that the dividends reflect multiple years' earnings, and the plans' margins are in the 2 percent to 3 percent range.
OHIO: Resolutions continue to be introduced in Ohio with respect to implementation of anticipated federal health care reform. Specifically, a new resolution was recently introduced requesting all members of the General Assembly to support the public plan option as part of national health care reform. This resolution adds to other pending resolutions on health care reform, such as one supporting rights for people to enter into private contracts with health care providers for health care services and to purchase private health care coverage; and another to amend Ohio's Constitution to prohibit a law or rule from compelling a person, employer, or health care provider to participate in a health care system. They are not expected to pass, as the legislature continues to focus mainly on budgetary matters.
OKLAHOMA: While testifying at a hearing before the House Appropriations and Budget Subcommittee, the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector suggested eliminating all health insurance options except for “HealthChoice” to cut $100 million in state employee benefits costs. Currently state employees can enroll in one of eight health insurance plans offered by four HMOs through the Employees Benefits Council or one of the HealthChoice plans offered by the Oklahoma State and Education Employees Group Insurance Board. Employees receive an allowance to offset the costs of the plans. According to state law, the allowance is calculated based on the average cost of the high-option health insurance plans, plus the average of the dental plan costs, plus the cost of life insurance, plus the cost of disability insurance, plus 75 percent of the dependent health costs, if applicable. Steve Burrage said the current arrangement creates a situation of "adverse selection" where healthy, younger employees purchase the less expensive health insurance policies offered by the HMOs, and less healthy, older employees buy the more expensive HealthChoice policies. However, both employees receive the same benefit allowance. In his FY2009 executive budget, Governor Brad Henry proposed adjusting the benefit allowance formula by giving the HealthChoice high-option plan a 40 percent weight. The proposed adjustment did not make it into the final budget.
WISCONSIN: Proposed legislation is circulating in the Senate that would create explicit statutory authority for the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) to oversee operation of self-funded plans serving public-sector employees, resolve consumer complaints, and monitor reserve and reinsurance levels. Additionally, the bill would apply state minimum coverage requirements, such as mammograms, chiropractic care, diabetes education and care, and require a governmental body that provides a self-funded health plan to provide reports and replies to requests for information to the OCI as they relate to the plan. This bill is aimed at self-funded plans offered by cities, towns, villages, counties and school districts.
Week in Health Insurance Reform EasyToInsureME
December 16, 2009
This Week in Health Reform—Legislative Overview
Senate
The Senate this week continued debate on its health care reform legislation, H.R. 3590, “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”. The two most controversial issues continue to be the public option and abortion, with both issues being discussed at length last week. On December 9, Senate Democrats blocked an amendment, 54-45, by Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that would tighten restrictions for funding of abortions. The amendment’s language mirrored what was in the House legislation that passed last month to the opposition of many Progressive Democrats. Majority Leader Reid (D-NV), voted down the amendment stating that the language in the existing Senate bill already adequately states that insurance plans (public or private) in the new exchange would be restricted from using taxpayer money for abortions.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Democrats Ben Nelson (NE), Bob Casey (PA), Kent Conrad (ND) and Byron Dorgan (ND), Ted Kaufman (DE) and Mark Pryor (AR) all supported the amendment. An outspoken opponent on abortion, it is unclear whether or not Nelson will support a final bill without the amendment. If he does not, then Reid has the additional task of ensuring that at least one Republican Senator votes in favor of his bill to secure the 60 votes needed to block a filibuster.
In order to break the bottleneck in the Senate over the public option last week, a group of ten moderate and liberal Democrats negotiated a compromise agreement that they said would appease both moderate and liberal Democrats – and perhaps interest some moderate Republicans. The re-formatted public option would create a national insurance plan, run by nonprofit private insurance companies, and supervised by the Office of Personnel Management. The program is said to be modeled after the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), which currently covers more than eight million federal employees, including members of Congress. To appease the liberal base of the Democratic Party, the compromise also reportedly created an expansion of Medicare to individuals between the ages of 55 to 64.
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT), an Independent who often caucuses with the Democrats, has been an outspoken opponent of the Medicare expansion provision and publicly stated that he would not vote for any bill that includes it. While Senators still remain quiet on the details of the legislation, stating that they are waiting to receive a cost analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) before discussing it publicly, it looks like the Medicare expansion provision has been removed from the pending legislation.
Reid is still aiming to have a vote on the Senate’s portion of the health care reform bill ahead of the Christmas holiday.
House
Last week Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) publicly stated that she would not discard the option of keeping House members in Washington for part of Christmas week – if it means that they make progress in passing health care reform legislation. Pelosi reiterated both her support for President Obama’s top domestic priority – health care reform – and her enthusiasm for seeing the Senate’s version of the bill.
Overview: NFIB Opposes Senate Health Care Reform Bill
On December 8, the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), an association that represents small and independent businesses, publicly stated its opposition to the Senate’s “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (H.R. 3590).
See below for excerpts from the letter:
* The letter states that “the most recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study detailing the effect that H.R. 3590 will have on insurance premiums reinforces that, despite claims by its supporters, the bill will not deliver the widely-promised help to the small business community. Instead, CBO findings report that the bill will increase non-group premiums by 10 to 13 percent and result in, at best, a two percent decrease for small group coverage by 2016. These findings tell small business all it needs to know – that the current bill does not do enough to reduce costs for small business owners and their employees.”
* “Despite the inclusion of insurance market reforms in the small-group and individual marketplaces, the savings that may materialize are too small for too few and the increases in premium costs are too great for too many. Those costs, along with greater government involvement, higher taxes and new mandates that are disproportionately targeted at small business and are being used to finance H.R. 3590, create a reality that is worse than the status quo for small business.”
* “...the excessively tight age rating (3:1) in H.R. 3590 will increase more costs than it will decrease, and make coverage unaffordable for the very populations that are most beneficial to the insurance pool – the young and the healthy. Independent actuaries have analyzed the negative impact of such tight bands and have indicated that there will be devastating effects to the long-term viability of a pool without action to correct this rating imbalance.”
This Week in Health Reform—Legislative Overview
Senate
The Senate this week continued debate on its health care reform legislation, H.R. 3590, “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”. The two most controversial issues continue to be the public option and abortion, with both issues being discussed at length last week. On December 9, Senate Democrats blocked an amendment, 54-45, by Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) that would tighten restrictions for funding of abortions. The amendment’s language mirrored what was in the House legislation that passed last month to the opposition of many Progressive Democrats. Majority Leader Reid (D-NV), voted down the amendment stating that the language in the existing Senate bill already adequately states that insurance plans (public or private) in the new exchange would be restricted from using taxpayer money for abortions.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Democrats Ben Nelson (NE), Bob Casey (PA), Kent Conrad (ND) and Byron Dorgan (ND), Ted Kaufman (DE) and Mark Pryor (AR) all supported the amendment. An outspoken opponent on abortion, it is unclear whether or not Nelson will support a final bill without the amendment. If he does not, then Reid has the additional task of ensuring that at least one Republican Senator votes in favor of his bill to secure the 60 votes needed to block a filibuster.
In order to break the bottleneck in the Senate over the public option last week, a group of ten moderate and liberal Democrats negotiated a compromise agreement that they said would appease both moderate and liberal Democrats – and perhaps interest some moderate Republicans. The re-formatted public option would create a national insurance plan, run by nonprofit private insurance companies, and supervised by the Office of Personnel Management. The program is said to be modeled after the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), which currently covers more than eight million federal employees, including members of Congress. To appease the liberal base of the Democratic Party, the compromise also reportedly created an expansion of Medicare to individuals between the ages of 55 to 64.
Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT), an Independent who often caucuses with the Democrats, has been an outspoken opponent of the Medicare expansion provision and publicly stated that he would not vote for any bill that includes it. While Senators still remain quiet on the details of the legislation, stating that they are waiting to receive a cost analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) before discussing it publicly, it looks like the Medicare expansion provision has been removed from the pending legislation.
Reid is still aiming to have a vote on the Senate’s portion of the health care reform bill ahead of the Christmas holiday.
House
Last week Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) publicly stated that she would not discard the option of keeping House members in Washington for part of Christmas week – if it means that they make progress in passing health care reform legislation. Pelosi reiterated both her support for President Obama’s top domestic priority – health care reform – and her enthusiasm for seeing the Senate’s version of the bill.
Overview: NFIB Opposes Senate Health Care Reform Bill
On December 8, the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), an association that represents small and independent businesses, publicly stated its opposition to the Senate’s “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (H.R. 3590).
See below for excerpts from the letter:
* The letter states that “the most recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study detailing the effect that H.R. 3590 will have on insurance premiums reinforces that, despite claims by its supporters, the bill will not deliver the widely-promised help to the small business community. Instead, CBO findings report that the bill will increase non-group premiums by 10 to 13 percent and result in, at best, a two percent decrease for small group coverage by 2016. These findings tell small business all it needs to know – that the current bill does not do enough to reduce costs for small business owners and their employees.”
* “Despite the inclusion of insurance market reforms in the small-group and individual marketplaces, the savings that may materialize are too small for too few and the increases in premium costs are too great for too many. Those costs, along with greater government involvement, higher taxes and new mandates that are disproportionately targeted at small business and are being used to finance H.R. 3590, create a reality that is worse than the status quo for small business.”
* “...the excessively tight age rating (3:1) in H.R. 3590 will increase more costs than it will decrease, and make coverage unaffordable for the very populations that are most beneficial to the insurance pool – the young and the healthy. Independent actuaries have analyzed the negative impact of such tight bands and have indicated that there will be devastating effects to the long-term viability of a pool without action to correct this rating imbalance.”
Friday, December 11, 2009
Health Insurance Quotes Reform Weeklys EasyToInsureME
DECEMBER 11, 2009
This Week in Health Reform
This week Senate lawmakers continued to debate numerous proposed amendments to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-NV) health care reform bill.
An updated analysis by our parent company shows that, with the proposed health care reform legislation, across- the-board premiums will increase significantly for younger and healthier people who purchase insurance on the individual market or through small employer groups.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...EasyToInsureME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Senate Negotiations
Senate Continues Debate on Health Care Reform Bill: As Senate lawmakers continued to debate through the weekend and voted on proposed amendments, President Barack Obama encouraged this effort by visiting Capital Hill on Sunday and urging lawmakers to put aside their differences and pass the historic legislation. While the President did not mention abortion or the government-run option specifically, those issues remain particularly divisive and at the center of debate on the Senate floor:
* Abortion - On Tuesday the Senate rejected (54-45) an amendment proposed by Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) that would have imposed restrictions on coverage of abortion services for people who received subsidies to buy insurance. Sen. Nelson has indicated that he will not support a health care reform bill that does not include language restricting abortion coverage. Tuesday's vote puts into question whether Sen. Reid has the 60 votes necessary to pass the reform package.
* Government-Run Option - On Tuesday night a group of 10 appointed Democratic Senate lawmakers announced a tentative agreement in regards to the public option. In an effort to remove a major hurdle to passing legislation this year, the group of negotiators offered an alternative program to the government-run option that would create several national insurance plans administered by private companies but negotiated by the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees health policies for federal workers. The negotiators said that a government plan would only be created if private firms were unable to deliver acceptable national policies.
The agreement would allow individuals to buy into Medicare starting at age 55, and insurance companies would face new regulations, including a requirement that they spend at least 90 cents of every dollar collected in premiums on medical services for customers.
In response to the agreement, the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, the American Federation of Hospitals - along with other health care companies, including insurers and drug makers - expressed concerns over the proposed Medicare expansion. Some also voiced concerns that the agreement simply represents another form of a public option. Those in opposition cite potential cost increases, low Medicare reimbursements and greater government control over parts of the health care industry. Hospital representatives said an expansion of Medicare would violate a deal they reached with the White House this year to give up $155 billion in Medicare payments over the next decade. Furthermore, The National Federation of Independent Business, a small-business association, released a statement opposing the legislation as an inadequate response to rising costs.
Currently Sen. Reid has only released a few specific details about the agreement, and lawmakers are hesitant to endorse the plan until it is better understood. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has indicated that the inclusion of a public option trigger may be a possible deal breaker. Sen. Reid presented this new agreement to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to be analyzed and is currently waiting for the CBO costs estimates.
In addition, on Wednesday Senate lawmakers debated an amendment offered by Byron L. Dorgan (D-ND) that would allow for the importation of prescription drugs from other countries. Should it pass, the measure could threaten the pharmaceutical industry's support for President Obama's health care reform. The pharmaceutical industry strongly opposes allowing prescription drug imports, indicating that the risk for counterfeit drugs would increase. While the amendment was supposed to come to a vote on Wednesday, an agreement was not reached and debate continued on Thursday.
Other Activities
Federal Insurers Warn of Higher Premiums: The Association of Federal Health Organizations , which includes federal employee-sponsored health insurance companies and Associate Member Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, is starting to make waves on Capitol Hill with information released in a November 25 report to the Office of Management and Budget. The report indicates that health insurance premiums could go up and benefits could be hurt due to impending fees on the insurance industry and the excise tax on premiums above a certain amount.
Drug Makers May See Increased Fees: Media reports indicate that the bill emerging from the Senate may include fees on the pharmaceutical industry that are greater than the $80 billion originally discussed in June. Given that the House bill would cost drug makers about $140 billion, the eventual House-Senate bill is likely to include fees exceeding $80 billion.
Public Opinion
Americans Oppose Reform Plan: As special interest groups express concern over the latest Senate proposal, polls continue to show that Americans are increasingly worried about the impact of reform. The most recent Quinnipiac University Poll indicates that Americans disapprove (52-38 percent) of the health care reform proposal under consideration in Congress. Furthermore, a Bloomberg National Poll indicates that 62 percent of Americans say they are mostly pessimistic that they would benefit from the bill.
Looking Ahead
Senate lawmakers will continue working around the clock and weekends to debate and vote on the proposed amendments. Sen. Reid is still pushing to have a final Senate reform package put together by Christmas.
This Week in Health Reform
This week Senate lawmakers continued to debate numerous proposed amendments to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-NV) health care reform bill.
An updated analysis by our parent company shows that, with the proposed health care reform legislation, across- the-board premiums will increase significantly for younger and healthier people who purchase insurance on the individual market or through small employer groups.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...EasyToInsureME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Senate Negotiations
Senate Continues Debate on Health Care Reform Bill: As Senate lawmakers continued to debate through the weekend and voted on proposed amendments, President Barack Obama encouraged this effort by visiting Capital Hill on Sunday and urging lawmakers to put aside their differences and pass the historic legislation. While the President did not mention abortion or the government-run option specifically, those issues remain particularly divisive and at the center of debate on the Senate floor:
* Abortion - On Tuesday the Senate rejected (54-45) an amendment proposed by Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) that would have imposed restrictions on coverage of abortion services for people who received subsidies to buy insurance. Sen. Nelson has indicated that he will not support a health care reform bill that does not include language restricting abortion coverage. Tuesday's vote puts into question whether Sen. Reid has the 60 votes necessary to pass the reform package.
* Government-Run Option - On Tuesday night a group of 10 appointed Democratic Senate lawmakers announced a tentative agreement in regards to the public option. In an effort to remove a major hurdle to passing legislation this year, the group of negotiators offered an alternative program to the government-run option that would create several national insurance plans administered by private companies but negotiated by the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees health policies for federal workers. The negotiators said that a government plan would only be created if private firms were unable to deliver acceptable national policies.
The agreement would allow individuals to buy into Medicare starting at age 55, and insurance companies would face new regulations, including a requirement that they spend at least 90 cents of every dollar collected in premiums on medical services for customers.
In response to the agreement, the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, the American Federation of Hospitals - along with other health care companies, including insurers and drug makers - expressed concerns over the proposed Medicare expansion. Some also voiced concerns that the agreement simply represents another form of a public option. Those in opposition cite potential cost increases, low Medicare reimbursements and greater government control over parts of the health care industry. Hospital representatives said an expansion of Medicare would violate a deal they reached with the White House this year to give up $155 billion in Medicare payments over the next decade. Furthermore, The National Federation of Independent Business, a small-business association, released a statement opposing the legislation as an inadequate response to rising costs.
Currently Sen. Reid has only released a few specific details about the agreement, and lawmakers are hesitant to endorse the plan until it is better understood. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has indicated that the inclusion of a public option trigger may be a possible deal breaker. Sen. Reid presented this new agreement to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to be analyzed and is currently waiting for the CBO costs estimates.
In addition, on Wednesday Senate lawmakers debated an amendment offered by Byron L. Dorgan (D-ND) that would allow for the importation of prescription drugs from other countries. Should it pass, the measure could threaten the pharmaceutical industry's support for President Obama's health care reform. The pharmaceutical industry strongly opposes allowing prescription drug imports, indicating that the risk for counterfeit drugs would increase. While the amendment was supposed to come to a vote on Wednesday, an agreement was not reached and debate continued on Thursday.
Other Activities
Federal Insurers Warn of Higher Premiums: The Association of Federal Health Organizations , which includes federal employee-sponsored health insurance companies and Associate Member Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, is starting to make waves on Capitol Hill with information released in a November 25 report to the Office of Management and Budget. The report indicates that health insurance premiums could go up and benefits could be hurt due to impending fees on the insurance industry and the excise tax on premiums above a certain amount.
Drug Makers May See Increased Fees: Media reports indicate that the bill emerging from the Senate may include fees on the pharmaceutical industry that are greater than the $80 billion originally discussed in June. Given that the House bill would cost drug makers about $140 billion, the eventual House-Senate bill is likely to include fees exceeding $80 billion.
Public Opinion
Americans Oppose Reform Plan: As special interest groups express concern over the latest Senate proposal, polls continue to show that Americans are increasingly worried about the impact of reform. The most recent Quinnipiac University Poll indicates that Americans disapprove (52-38 percent) of the health care reform proposal under consideration in Congress. Furthermore, a Bloomberg National Poll indicates that 62 percent of Americans say they are mostly pessimistic that they would benefit from the bill.
Looking Ahead
Senate lawmakers will continue working around the clock and weekends to debate and vote on the proposed amendments. Sen. Reid is still pushing to have a final Senate reform package put together by Christmas.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Health Insurance Quotes Reform EasyToInsureME
Week of December 7, 2009
The Senate began to slog its way through amendments (see below) last week in a process that promises to get harder, not easier. In the meantime, the debate continues as to whether the Senate bill would do anything significant to slow rising health care costs, and a Bloomberg story points out that a number of economists and analysts are doubtful that it will. The White House defends the bill's ability to slow costs, but some analysts predict that Congress will need to make many more tough decisions to have a real impact. According to Bloomberg, a group of Senators that includes Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) is taking aim at rising costs with an amendment that would include new requirements on providers to try to wring more costs out of the system. Anyone concerned about the rising cost of health care should be engaged in the process by reaching out to their Senators to urge a greater focus on bending the cost curve.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...EasyToInsureME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The Senate debate on health care reform actually consists of three simultaneous debates. The first is public on C-SPAN, and it's going slowly as Republicans are pressing for 60 votes as often as they can while Democrats try to speed things up. Nothing of any great moment has been passed or decided. The second debate is the one Majority Leader Harry Reid is conducting behind closed doors as he tries to garner 60 Democratic votes for some acceptable form of a public option. Once this is accomplished, most observers believe Reid will immediately file cloture to cut off debate on the bill itself. If successful at getting 60 votes, he will go straight to final passage, which would require 51 votes. This could happen before Christmas. The third debate is the one Reid is having with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over whether to have a conference at all. If the Senate can pass a bill the House can accept "as is," then there will be no need for a time-consuming conference that could unravel the bill. Thus, Reid is checking in with Pelosi frequently to see what he needs to be able to pass a bill and avoid a conference.
Since returning from its Thanksgiving break last week, the Senate has slowly been making its way through a number of amendments. Key votes so far include: approved an amendment that would require first-dollar coverage (no cost sharing) for certain preventive services; approved an amendment stating that nothing in the bill reduce guaranteed benefits under Medicare; defeated a motion that would have sent the bill back to the Finance Committee for the purpose of removing proposed cuts to Medicare; defeated an amendment that would have removed the CLASS Act provisions from the bill; defeated a motion that would have sent the bill back to the Finance Committee to eliminate the proposed Medicare Advantage funding cuts; approved an amendment requiring that nothing in the bill shall eliminate benefits “guaranteed by law” to Medicare Advantage enrollees (protects only benefits also covered by traditional Medicare and does not protect extra benefits and services provided by MA plans); and defeated an amendment that would have placed limits on how much attorneys can earn from medical malpractice lawsuits.
States
ALL STATES: The National Governors Association (NGA) has announced an initiative outlining preparations for federal health care reform. Titled "Rx for Health Reform - Affordable, Accessible, Accountable," the 2009-2010 initiative is led by Vermont Governor and NGA Chair James Douglas. It will focus on: providing governors with the information needed to transition to a new health care system; developing state-based system improvements and cost containment measures, including tools necessary to develop delivery system enhancements, looking at what is required under federal legislation, and highlighting other reforms the states could undertake to create a more efficient and effective health care system; and preparing states for implementing insurance market reforms, state-based exchanges, new mechanisms to support delivery system reform, and other national health reforms. The NGA's Health Care Task Force includes Governor Douglas and West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, both serving as co-chairs, as well as Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, New Hampshire Governor John Lynch, and Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski.
CALIFORNIA: The California Medical Association (CMA), the second largest medical association after Texas, has announced its opposition to the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” the health care reform bill being debated in the Senate. The CMA also opposed Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s comprehensive health care reform proposal in 2007. In other news, Republican Governor Schwarzenegger has appointed State Senator Abel Maldonado to serve as Lieutenant Governor, but Democrats in the legislature have vowed not to confirm the Republican Senator because they view him as a viable state-wide candidate who could be elected easily to the position. Maldonado still must be confirmed by the legislature, which has 90 days to act.
COLORADO: The Colorado Medical Society (CMS) continues to seek support for a bill that would define the practice of medicine as including medical necessity determinations and utilization reviews performed by health plan medical directors. As currently drafted, the proposal would potentially expose medical directors to disciplinary action by the state Board of Medicine when medical necessity or utilization review decisions are challenged. Several discussions have been held with the executive director of CMS to ascertain the nature of the problem the association is trying to address, particularly since the organization as a whole may not be supporting the bill.
ILLINOIS: Illinois' fiscal situation is "grim and getting worse." Illinois has a reported $12 billion structural budget deficit. Comptroller Hynes said Illinois had nearly $4.6 billion in unpaid bills at the end of September, a record development for the first quarter of any fiscal year. This, despite the state having borrowed $2.25 billion in short-term loans, which must be repaid before the end of FY2010. Hynes identified two factors that have had a major impact on the deteriorating fiscal position: the steep decline in economy-driven revenues, such as personal and corporate income taxes and sales taxes, and record lapse-period spending. Hynes predicted fiscal pressures would continue well into FY2011 and warned of record and prolonged payment delays for most categories of state programs and operations, including health care and social services. There will be increasing pressure on health care programs as the economic stimulus funds expire and the amount of money demanded by utilization increases continue to be realized. There are already significant payment cycle delays on portions of the State employee health plan. The budget situation will dominate discussions in the General Assembly, which reconvenes in January.
KANSAS: At the request of Kansas Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins, the Kansas Health Policy Authority recently announced that it estimates the health reform bill passed by the U.S. House would provide health insurance for 240,000 Kansans without coverage and possibly save the state treasury up to $25 million a year. It estimated the U.S. Senate Finance Committee bill would insure an estimated 190,000 Kansans and reduce state costs by $25 million to $50 million a year. The Authority also concluded that the House bill would provide more federal matching dollars for Medicaid and likely would allow a reduced package of benefits for Medicaid beneficiaries added to the state rolls as a result of health reform. Current Kansas Medicaid eligibility is among the strictest in the nation, with benefits generally available only to the oldest and youngest of the state’s poor. Childless adults of working age are not eligible and parents are enrolled only if they earn less than about 27 percent of poverty guidelines. Exceptions are made for pregnant women.
MICHIGAN: State House Democrats announced a plan last week to cut auto insurance rates through tighter restrictions on auto insurance companies and the medical portion of those claims, affecting subrogation and coordination of benefits for Aetna and Cofinity®. Generally, the proposal requires auto insurance companies to offer low-cost auto insurance to low-income drivers with good driving records. The bill also would: allow the state insurance commissioner to deny rate changes by auto insurance companies before they take effect; prohibit auto insurance rate increases for those with good driving records; prohibit auto insurers from using certain types of rating factors; and limit fees paid to doctors and hospitals for treating auto accident injuries. Michigan is the only state that requires all auto insurance policies to give unlimited medical coverage for injuries suffered in auto accidents. The proposal would change that requirement and allow motorists to buy maximum medical coverage as low as $50,000. This means that rate-regulated provider groups would likely have group policies pay auto claims rather than wait for adjudication of the claim in court, as they would not want their fees limited. In addition, the allowance of low medical coverage on auto claims would affect Aetna's subrogation and coordination of benefit activities with both auto carriers and Aetna enrollees.
MISSOURI: The Department of Insurance recently released its 2008 HMO Annual Report showing that the entire managed care market is declining. The report shows that the number of people enrolled in either an HMO or a major medical health insurance plan decreased 15 percent since 2006. PPO plans are gaining the most enrollment, and POS plans remain more popular in certain areas than HMO plans. Total premiums for managed care coverage continue to rise with the industry reporting a 7.5 percent increase from 2004 to 2008. The medical cost ratio for all HMOs operating in Missouri, covering only Missouri business, was 82 percent in 2008, compared to the nationwide industry number of 83.6 percent.
NEW JERSEY: The legislature returned from its extended recess and took action on legislation to establish a medical home demonstration project for the Medicaid population. Upon federal approval, the state Medicaid program would set out a three-year demonstration project with an annual evaluation and reporting requirement by the Division of Medicaid Assistance Services to the Governor and legislature. On the Senate side, Aetna offered support for legislation requiring chain restaurants to provide nutritional information for food and beverages on their menus. Similar legislation is currently making its way through the Assembly and will likely receive a full vote in both chambers prior to the end of the session.
NEW YORK: The legislature passed another deficit reduction plan, trimming spending and using unspent funds to plug a $2.7 billion dollar budget deficit. A large percentage of the revenue used to fill the gap came from federal stimulus money that was originally designated for the 2010 budget and cuts to the Medicaid trend factor. After intense lobbying and coalition efforts, the legislature did not pass the Governor's proposed 0.25 percent increase to the patient services assessment or "sick tax". In addition, the Senate did not pass the Marriage Equality Act, effectively defeating the bill for the year. The legislature will return to face a multi-billion dollar deficit again in January, and it is likely that increases to health insurance taxes will be back on the table.
UTAH: The Department of Insurance remains committed to pursuing legislation to expand the Utah Health Exchange Network Portal to include a master patient index that providers could access to obtain coverage eligibility information. The bill contains a number of troubling provisions, including a monthly batch reporting requirement on health plans. The proposal also includes a July 1, 2010 effective date allowing no time to update and test affected internal systems.
The Senate began to slog its way through amendments (see below) last week in a process that promises to get harder, not easier. In the meantime, the debate continues as to whether the Senate bill would do anything significant to slow rising health care costs, and a Bloomberg story points out that a number of economists and analysts are doubtful that it will. The White House defends the bill's ability to slow costs, but some analysts predict that Congress will need to make many more tough decisions to have a real impact. According to Bloomberg, a group of Senators that includes Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) is taking aim at rising costs with an amendment that would include new requirements on providers to try to wring more costs out of the system. Anyone concerned about the rising cost of health care should be engaged in the process by reaching out to their Senators to urge a greater focus on bending the cost curve.
Quoting & Saving just got easier...EasyToInsureME Health Insurance Quotes... Quote all carriers in seconds
Health insurance
Health insurance quotes
Federal
The Senate debate on health care reform actually consists of three simultaneous debates. The first is public on C-SPAN, and it's going slowly as Republicans are pressing for 60 votes as often as they can while Democrats try to speed things up. Nothing of any great moment has been passed or decided. The second debate is the one Majority Leader Harry Reid is conducting behind closed doors as he tries to garner 60 Democratic votes for some acceptable form of a public option. Once this is accomplished, most observers believe Reid will immediately file cloture to cut off debate on the bill itself. If successful at getting 60 votes, he will go straight to final passage, which would require 51 votes. This could happen before Christmas. The third debate is the one Reid is having with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over whether to have a conference at all. If the Senate can pass a bill the House can accept "as is," then there will be no need for a time-consuming conference that could unravel the bill. Thus, Reid is checking in with Pelosi frequently to see what he needs to be able to pass a bill and avoid a conference.
Since returning from its Thanksgiving break last week, the Senate has slowly been making its way through a number of amendments. Key votes so far include: approved an amendment that would require first-dollar coverage (no cost sharing) for certain preventive services; approved an amendment stating that nothing in the bill reduce guaranteed benefits under Medicare; defeated a motion that would have sent the bill back to the Finance Committee for the purpose of removing proposed cuts to Medicare; defeated an amendment that would have removed the CLASS Act provisions from the bill; defeated a motion that would have sent the bill back to the Finance Committee to eliminate the proposed Medicare Advantage funding cuts; approved an amendment requiring that nothing in the bill shall eliminate benefits “guaranteed by law” to Medicare Advantage enrollees (protects only benefits also covered by traditional Medicare and does not protect extra benefits and services provided by MA plans); and defeated an amendment that would have placed limits on how much attorneys can earn from medical malpractice lawsuits.
States
ALL STATES: The National Governors Association (NGA) has announced an initiative outlining preparations for federal health care reform. Titled "Rx for Health Reform - Affordable, Accessible, Accountable," the 2009-2010 initiative is led by Vermont Governor and NGA Chair James Douglas. It will focus on: providing governors with the information needed to transition to a new health care system; developing state-based system improvements and cost containment measures, including tools necessary to develop delivery system enhancements, looking at what is required under federal legislation, and highlighting other reforms the states could undertake to create a more efficient and effective health care system; and preparing states for implementing insurance market reforms, state-based exchanges, new mechanisms to support delivery system reform, and other national health reforms. The NGA's Health Care Task Force includes Governor Douglas and West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin, both serving as co-chairs, as well as Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, New Hampshire Governor John Lynch, and Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski.
CALIFORNIA: The California Medical Association (CMA), the second largest medical association after Texas, has announced its opposition to the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” the health care reform bill being debated in the Senate. The CMA also opposed Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s comprehensive health care reform proposal in 2007. In other news, Republican Governor Schwarzenegger has appointed State Senator Abel Maldonado to serve as Lieutenant Governor, but Democrats in the legislature have vowed not to confirm the Republican Senator because they view him as a viable state-wide candidate who could be elected easily to the position. Maldonado still must be confirmed by the legislature, which has 90 days to act.
COLORADO: The Colorado Medical Society (CMS) continues to seek support for a bill that would define the practice of medicine as including medical necessity determinations and utilization reviews performed by health plan medical directors. As currently drafted, the proposal would potentially expose medical directors to disciplinary action by the state Board of Medicine when medical necessity or utilization review decisions are challenged. Several discussions have been held with the executive director of CMS to ascertain the nature of the problem the association is trying to address, particularly since the organization as a whole may not be supporting the bill.
ILLINOIS: Illinois' fiscal situation is "grim and getting worse." Illinois has a reported $12 billion structural budget deficit. Comptroller Hynes said Illinois had nearly $4.6 billion in unpaid bills at the end of September, a record development for the first quarter of any fiscal year. This, despite the state having borrowed $2.25 billion in short-term loans, which must be repaid before the end of FY2010. Hynes identified two factors that have had a major impact on the deteriorating fiscal position: the steep decline in economy-driven revenues, such as personal and corporate income taxes and sales taxes, and record lapse-period spending. Hynes predicted fiscal pressures would continue well into FY2011 and warned of record and prolonged payment delays for most categories of state programs and operations, including health care and social services. There will be increasing pressure on health care programs as the economic stimulus funds expire and the amount of money demanded by utilization increases continue to be realized. There are already significant payment cycle delays on portions of the State employee health plan. The budget situation will dominate discussions in the General Assembly, which reconvenes in January.
KANSAS: At the request of Kansas Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins, the Kansas Health Policy Authority recently announced that it estimates the health reform bill passed by the U.S. House would provide health insurance for 240,000 Kansans without coverage and possibly save the state treasury up to $25 million a year. It estimated the U.S. Senate Finance Committee bill would insure an estimated 190,000 Kansans and reduce state costs by $25 million to $50 million a year. The Authority also concluded that the House bill would provide more federal matching dollars for Medicaid and likely would allow a reduced package of benefits for Medicaid beneficiaries added to the state rolls as a result of health reform. Current Kansas Medicaid eligibility is among the strictest in the nation, with benefits generally available only to the oldest and youngest of the state’s poor. Childless adults of working age are not eligible and parents are enrolled only if they earn less than about 27 percent of poverty guidelines. Exceptions are made for pregnant women.
MICHIGAN: State House Democrats announced a plan last week to cut auto insurance rates through tighter restrictions on auto insurance companies and the medical portion of those claims, affecting subrogation and coordination of benefits for Aetna and Cofinity®. Generally, the proposal requires auto insurance companies to offer low-cost auto insurance to low-income drivers with good driving records. The bill also would: allow the state insurance commissioner to deny rate changes by auto insurance companies before they take effect; prohibit auto insurance rate increases for those with good driving records; prohibit auto insurers from using certain types of rating factors; and limit fees paid to doctors and hospitals for treating auto accident injuries. Michigan is the only state that requires all auto insurance policies to give unlimited medical coverage for injuries suffered in auto accidents. The proposal would change that requirement and allow motorists to buy maximum medical coverage as low as $50,000. This means that rate-regulated provider groups would likely have group policies pay auto claims rather than wait for adjudication of the claim in court, as they would not want their fees limited. In addition, the allowance of low medical coverage on auto claims would affect Aetna's subrogation and coordination of benefit activities with both auto carriers and Aetna enrollees.
MISSOURI: The Department of Insurance recently released its 2008 HMO Annual Report showing that the entire managed care market is declining. The report shows that the number of people enrolled in either an HMO or a major medical health insurance plan decreased 15 percent since 2006. PPO plans are gaining the most enrollment, and POS plans remain more popular in certain areas than HMO plans. Total premiums for managed care coverage continue to rise with the industry reporting a 7.5 percent increase from 2004 to 2008. The medical cost ratio for all HMOs operating in Missouri, covering only Missouri business, was 82 percent in 2008, compared to the nationwide industry number of 83.6 percent.
NEW JERSEY: The legislature returned from its extended recess and took action on legislation to establish a medical home demonstration project for the Medicaid population. Upon federal approval, the state Medicaid program would set out a three-year demonstration project with an annual evaluation and reporting requirement by the Division of Medicaid Assistance Services to the Governor and legislature. On the Senate side, Aetna offered support for legislation requiring chain restaurants to provide nutritional information for food and beverages on their menus. Similar legislation is currently making its way through the Assembly and will likely receive a full vote in both chambers prior to the end of the session.
NEW YORK: The legislature passed another deficit reduction plan, trimming spending and using unspent funds to plug a $2.7 billion dollar budget deficit. A large percentage of the revenue used to fill the gap came from federal stimulus money that was originally designated for the 2010 budget and cuts to the Medicaid trend factor. After intense lobbying and coalition efforts, the legislature did not pass the Governor's proposed 0.25 percent increase to the patient services assessment or "sick tax". In addition, the Senate did not pass the Marriage Equality Act, effectively defeating the bill for the year. The legislature will return to face a multi-billion dollar deficit again in January, and it is likely that increases to health insurance taxes will be back on the table.
UTAH: The Department of Insurance remains committed to pursuing legislation to expand the Utah Health Exchange Network Portal to include a master patient index that providers could access to obtain coverage eligibility information. The bill contains a number of troubling provisions, including a monthly batch reporting requirement on health plans. The proposal also includes a July 1, 2010 effective date allowing no time to update and test affected internal systems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
